• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A new CPA website

A new CPA website

June 12, 2009 JimK Leave a Comment

As I mentioned in the preceding post, I’ve been working a lot more on CPA business. How’d I get so involved? It’s a long story, and one that I’ll probably get into later; I’ve been on the Board since February, and President since March.

In March, we made a long list of things that needed work. The web site was right up there. One thing that grated on me when I went to the old site was the aesthetics; the red-on-black color scheme never did anything for me. But that wasn’t the big problem. Behind the scenes, the site was set up so that you made changes using an administrative panel, using an ordinary web browser rather than an html editor.

Done right (and that includes being suited to the task), an administrative panel can be a real time-saver, trading flexibility for speed and ease of use. Done wrong, you get all the inflexibility and none of the ease of use, making it maddingly difficult to do simple things, and essentially impossible to do anything out of the ordinary. Ours was like that. In addition, it had a nasty little quirk: whatever changes you made became immediately effective on the public web site; there was no way to test anything off line. You also couldn’t save the old files so that you could easily revert after a mistake.

We had a few technical glitches in getting the new site going. Huntington Witherill did the basic design (and a fine job he did) using GoLive. I’m using Dreamweaver CS4. We tried working on the site together, and it was a disaster; we kept stepping on each other’s toes. Huntington couldn’t upgrade to Dreamweaver because he had a IBM-architecture (PowerPC) Mac and the new version only runs on Intel. He was in the process of upgrading to an x86 processor, but in the meantime, we were at loggerheads. Realizing the difficulties we faced, Huntington passed the responsibility for the web site to me; he will get it back when he’s completely converted.

A lot of the GoLive design automation didn’t travel well to Dreamweaver. I reconstructed most of the repeating aspects of the site using Dreamweaver templates, added content, and you can see the results. I think it’s a big improvement, buy, hey, I’m deeply prejudiced. The esthetics are entirely Huntington’s, and a lot of the content is his as well. I was able to add all the interviews I did for the old newsletter.

The new site is here. Let me know what you think.

The Last Word

← PhotoLucida 2009: what it means for me Scanning vs Stitching →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.