• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / About that flow…

About that flow…

June 30, 2006 JimK Leave a Comment

There’s a saying in the military that no battle plan survives first contact with the enemy. There’s a corollary in photography. No matter how much you plan and scheme and try to work things out ahead of time, the making of the image never goes quite the way you thought it would; this is especially true at the beginning of a project. Military planners consider the evanescence of battle plans to be a bad thing, and they try to minimize the damage to the plan by thinking out in advance how things can go wrong. I think the way that the world stubbornly refuses to bend to your preconceptions is one of the great things about photography, and a powerful source for creativity if you treat it as a guest.

The first level of the artist’s dance with reality happens even if everything is under your control. Say you’re in the studio, working on a still life composed of objects you have collected. All you have to do is arrange them, light them, pick the lens, select the camera angle, frame the shot, and trip the shutter. Simple, right? Let’s imagine that you have worked out the image in your mind, and even made a sketch. Reality attacks with the second object you put down; a quick peek at the ground glass reveals that it doesn’t hide something on the first object the way you’d imagined. When you turn on the modeling lights, things really start to go south. The shadows are hard where you thought they’d be soft, and they fall differently than you’d planned. Now you have two choices; you can struggle with the setup and bend over backwards to try to get the shot you’d first imagined, or you can take what the world gives you and work with it to get a great image, even if it’s not the image you set out to get. Struggling doesn’t frequently succeed for me, but apparently it works often enough to keep some people coming back to it. Taking that shadow that’s harder than I thought it would be as a new starting place, and figuring out how I can work with it, rather than immediately reaching for the nearest diffuser, works better for me. It really is a dance; sometimes you lead, and sometimes you let the world lead. The same approach works wonders when you’re in the darkroom or at the computer doing the post-exposure part of image-making.

It’s even more obvious that you’re not totally in control when you’re out in the world. There’s a progressive diminution of hegemony as you progress from unpopulated landscapes to working with models on location to street photography. What works for me is to treat them all the same. You try something, see what you get, and then figure out how to make that into a good image.

I recently had the world show me the way to an entirely new series. A few years ago, I was in Yuma, Arizona waiting for dawn. I started making images of some funky old gas stations. I thought there was some potential there, so a few months ago I went out to explore the concept. The very first night, peeking at the tiny images on the camera’s LCD display, I realized the new series wasn’t going to be just about gas stations. In fact, gas stations play a tiny role in the Hopper-esque essay on urban isolation that is emerging for me. It’s something I never would have gotten to by sitting in a room and planning.

There’s another benefit to allowing your plans to be malleable and consciously looking to reality for clues to how you should change them: it feels good. There is something calming and pleasant about the state of mind that allows you to be open to what the world has to give you.

The Last Word

← Sloof Lirpa announces a phone! How many exposures? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.