• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Another medium tele test — conclusion

Another medium tele test — conclusion

March 11, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the conclusion of a test of the following lenses on the Sony a7RII:

  • Zeiss 85mm f/1.8 Batis.
  • Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 Otus.
  • Leica 90mm f/2 Apo Summicron-M ASPH.
  • AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/1.4 G.
  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro.

The test starts here.

It’s been a long journey, and there are some loose ends that I may get around to, but it’s time for me to wrap up this lens test. I’ve got a Sony a6300 arriving today, and I want to get started testing it.

Drawing broad conclusions about these lenses is bound to be subjective, if only because I need to pick out the things worth commenting on, but also that my conclusion in each area of inquiry are based on my interpretations of the results. If you want objectivity, I’m afraid you’re going to have to pore through all the tests and draw your own conclusions.

My first conclusion is one I’ve stated earlier. There’s not a bad lens in this test. Keep that in mind as you read on. Criticisms of one aspect of one lens are relative to all the other lenses, and don’t mean that any lens is a poor performer in an absolute sense.

The Otus is an incredible lens at a very high price. It shows its advantages over the other lenses mostly at the widest three apertures. LoCA is an exception; the Otus performance is far ahead of any of the other lenses at all tested apertures, although as depth of field/focus increases, LoCA is less of a concern.

The Summicron is a conundrum: an expensive lens that tests well, but by no means great, that manages to make images that are good, and often startlingly so.

The Batis is a great match for the a7RII, or any a7x camera. It produces good to great results under almost all circumstances. Its tendency to autofocus on the red channel under some circumstances is a minor concern, but the errors are small, and, in applications like portraiture, are unlikely to be a problem. To put these errors in perspective, they are smaller than the focus shift errors that you’d likely experience using a DSLR, focusing wide open, and shooting a couple of stops down from that. Remember that focus shift is not a problem with the Batis on the a7rII with Setting Effect on.

From all the hype, I expected the Sony 90/2.8 to be a sharper lens. Not that there’s anything wrong with what it delivers, it’s just that the word on the street was that it was the greatest thing since bottled beer, and I found it merely excellent.

I wouldn’t use the Nikon 85 on an a7x camera, given the choice, although it’s fine on a Nikon body. The big reason is the fact that there’s no AF and only an approximate setting of aperture with currently available adapters. There’s one that has just started shipping that purports to fix that, but it’s a work in progress at this point.

 

 

The Last Word

← The best focal lengths for landscapes Sony a6300 — RN vs ISO →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.