• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V bokeh on X2D

Hasselblad XCD 90/2.5 V bokeh on X2D

December 1, 2023 JimK 5 Comments

This is the 46th in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

In informal testing the background bokeh of the Hasselblad XCD 90 mm f/2.5 V lens looked very smooth. I no longer have access to the artificial star I usually use for this kind of testing, but I improvised with a NAS box with disk activity lights. With the lens wide open and ISO set to 64, I made a series of exposures with the lens focus distance set from minimum focus distance to infinity.

 

Lens at MFD

The OOF bokeh balls are very smooth here.

 

 

And they stay smooth all the way to in-focus.

In focus

 

Mildly OOF, the balls are still smooth.

But as the focus distance moves well behind the lights, they begin to acquire more energy towards the periphery of the circle of confusion.

 

 

 

Lens focus at infinity

Not bad, though. Actually, better than not bad. Quite nice. And I don’t see any onion ring bokeh.

I think most anybody would be satisfied with this performance. Having the background out of focus is much more common than having the foreground OOF.

The Last Word

← Hasselblad 90/2.5 XCD on X2D, edge falloff Foveon Merrill color accuracy →

Comments

  1. Gordon Ownby says

    December 7, 2023 at 9:12 am

    Jim –

    Yes, those look very nice. Can you tell us the shutter speed(s) on those photos? (I ask because of the bokeh ball problem that I’ve experienced above 1/300 sec with the 2.8/65 ‘legacy’ lens.)

    Thanks for posting those photos.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 7, 2023 at 9:49 am

      Between 0.8 and 1.5 seconds.

      Reply
      • Gordon Ownby says

        December 7, 2023 at 12:17 pm

        Perfect.

        Thanks for all that you do on this forum, Jim.

        – Gordon

        Reply
  2. ArtY says

    October 3, 2024 at 5:57 am

    Indeed, I was comparing the bokeh of this 90V with the Nikon 135mm Plena and I almost threw up when I looked at the bokeh of the Plena. Something is quite wrong with the new group of Nikon lenses.
    Not sure what happened to Nikon newer lenses. My gut feeling is that probably they have inserted too many aspherical elements into the tube. The designer seemed to be focusing all their efforts on resolution, compromising the bokeh.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 3, 2024 at 8:01 am

      I really like the Plena bokeh.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.