• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Using InDesign to lay out an exhibition

Using InDesign to lay out an exhibition

January 25, 2024 JimK 8 Comments

In the past, when there’s been no curator to sequence, size, and position the images for an exhibition, I’ve done it using Visio. I’ve got an exhibition coming up, and there’s no curator, so I need to do the lay0ut myself. This time, I decided to see if I could use InDesign. Turns out it works great. You can set up pages in InDesign that are the actual size of the walls — at least I had no problem with 48 inch high by 240 inch long pages. Then you export the images from your DAM (I use Lr) at actual size in TIFF format (I’m using a printer with native resolution of 300 ppi, so that’s what I’m using).

Place those images into InDesign, and they’ll automatically be the right size. There’s no image scaling or messing around with thumbnails, which are sources of human error.

InDesign will export the images as JPEGs or PDFs for the people hanging the exhibition to use.

 

 

The Last Word

← Hasselblad CFV 100C on Hasselblad 907X Visible noise and CFA filter spectra, part six →

Comments

  1. BrianK says

    January 25, 2024 at 5:32 pm

    Jim, when and where is the exhibition? I would really love to see it in person.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 25, 2024 at 5:45 pm

      Unfortunately, it’s at a location not open to the general public.

      Reply
  2. Paul says

    January 27, 2024 at 9:57 am

    I’ve found InDesign quite useful for this also.

    It was my choice because I happen to have it—and because I’ve used it enough that there’s no friction when doing a simple project like this. I know people who are more comfortable with other graphics software, like Illustrator, or even AutoCad. Whatever you have and are most comfortable with will work great.

    Whatever you use, it’s helpful if the gallery director can share floorplans and elevations, so you know exactly what you’re working with.

    Reply
  3. Stirling says

    February 7, 2024 at 1:55 pm

    Question about indesign and image scaling it seems like you might have an answer to. I’m in a situation where I’m printing a bunch of 24 mpx (6000×4000) files for 8×10″ windows; in indesign I would usually lay it out for a big batch on a 44″ roll print, print at around 8.25×10.5″ for some flexibility in final framing after trimming, and not give it any more thought. However, I got to thinking today, would there be an impact to image quality from downsampling by weird decimal factors? The print dimensions of 8.25×10.5″ yield a PPI of 484.86, which I would then downsize to 300 PPI on export to match the printer. Would I see a better result from a print at, say, 8 8/9″ inch on the short edge (another weird number, for the sake of argument), such that the PPI of the image is 450? Or is Adobe’s downsampling good enough, and the print size small enough, and the variables minute enough, that there wouldn’t be a perceptual difference?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 7, 2024 at 3:23 pm

      I don’t know how — or even if — InDesign resamples. It may let the printer driver do it, which you don’t want. I may have to do some research and experimentation.

      Reply
  4. Barry Goyette says

    April 2, 2024 at 4:49 pm

    Ha – I’ve been laying out my shows in inDesign for years, and frankly, it always seems to blow gallery owners minds. Recently in my first Museum show, when I walked in with a dimensioned layout of the entire show for the conservator, The curator just smiled and shook her head “Of course you did!” before thanking me for being the first artist do so in her experience. I build mine at 1:1 scale and so it’s super easy to be pretty precise. Honestly I wouldn’t know how to do it any other way.

    Reply
  5. Alexander says

    May 15, 2024 at 3:43 am

    How would it work of the images are framed? Do you have to specify a frame for each pic in PS?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 15, 2024 at 6:44 am

      You could design the frames in InDesign, and place the images from Ps inside them.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.