• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / NEX-7 — more Zeiss 24mm autofocus testing

NEX-7 — more Zeiss 24mm autofocus testing

January 22, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

Yesterday morning, I set out to make a series of pairs of images, letting the NEX-7 focus the first image in the pair, and manually focusing the second. The images did not turn out the way I expected. I expected to catch the NEX-7 making autofocus mistakes. Now that I understand the limitations of the NEX-7 autofocus better, I found no out-and-out mistakes at all when I used it in circumstances where it can be expected to work. I also expected that I would be more accurate manually focusing in all situations then the NEX-7 autofocus. I was wrong.

Here’s the good news. The NEX-7 autofocus is quite accurate if the entire portion of the image surrounded by the focus indication rectangle in the viewfinder is essentially in the same image plane, and possesses information of medium or high spatial frequency. If the portion of the image that the camera is focusing on contains elements of varying distances so that they can’t all be in focus, you don’t know where the camera is going to focus.

Here’s the bad news. While I continue to admire the concept of the feature of the NEX-7 that allows you to manually tweak the autofocus just by twisting the focusing ring of Sony lenses, experience has caused me to give the implementation mixed reviews.

There are two problems: the first is that the magnified image that appears when you twist the focusing ring is the 6x magnification not 12x. That makes it difficult to see when the image is in sharp focus. I looked in vain for menu settings to allow me to change this. It is possible to get the magnification to briefly go to 12x by pressing the lower button on the back of the camera while holding the shutter release half-depressed, but I couldn’t get it to stay that way for more than a second, and I took a lot of unintended photographs while trying.

When you twist the focusing ring on the NEX-7 you’re not directly controlling the focus of the lens. The connection between the ring and the focusing rack is electrical, not mechanical. When you twist the ring, you’re telling the camera firmware that you want it to change the focus distance, and the firmware then tells the lens what to do. The algorithms that do that do not provide a good simulation of mechanical focusing. A small part of this is the feel of the focusing ring, which doesn’t replicate the action a Zeiss or Leica M-mount lens. The larger problem is that the translation of ring angle to focusing is a bit strange. I don’t think it’s time lag, but I have a tendency to overshoot when making small corrections. I’ll be doing a post on this in the future.

Both the image magnification and the focus algorithm problems are probably fixable in firmware, and I hope Sony addresses them.

I made a set of 30 pairs of photographs of subjects in which the Sony autofocus should work well. In the first image of each pair, I let the camera focus. In the second, I tweaked the focus manually. In roughtly a third of the images, I did as good a job as the autofocus – maybe better in one or two. In the rest, the autofocus was better than I was.

Some examples follow.

First, here’s an image where the autofocus area, one-third in from the left and one-third down from the top, contains objects of varying distance. This photograph was made at f/2.8, handheld at a fortieth of a second. It is surprising to me that the resolution of the NEX-7 sensor is so good that the depth of field of the lens can’t span the range of distances in the autofocus area. It is also surprising to me that the shutter release is so shake-free that you can make a photograph this sharp at such a low shutter speed.

Here’s a one-pixel enlargement of the area that should be in focus. The camera, on autofocus, focused behind the tree trunk that I wanted in focus:

Here’s a one-pixel enlargement of that area when I focused. It looks the way I intended.

Second, here’s an image in which the autofocus area, one-third in from the left and one-third down from the top, contains objects which all fall within the depth of field of the lens when it’s focused on any of them:

Here’s a one-pixel enlargement of the area that should be in focus:

Here’s a one-pixel enlargement of that area when I focused. The sharpness is the same, to my eye.

The Last Word

← NEX-7 — Zeiss 24 mm autofocus testing NEX-7 — manual focusing experiments →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.