• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D4 summary

Nikon D4 summary

May 2, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

The Nikon D3 was a breakthrough camera, offering noise levels and ISO settings that hadn’t ever been simultaneously approached. Two years later, the D3s raised the bar somewhat, offering better ergonomics for the live view feature, and providing slightly better high ISO performance. The difference between the D4 and the D3s is larger than the difference between the D3s and its predecessor, but nowhere near the difference between the D2h and the D3.

The D4 offers D3s noise levels at slightly higher resolution. The economics on the D4 are improved. Pick almost any button on the camera, hold it down, and use the two wheels on the upper right of the camera body – the one on the front operated by your index finger, and the one on the back by your thumb – and you can quickly and accurately make changes without having to access the menu system. This allows the number of buttons and dials to be reduced, and makes the camera easy to learn, since there’s now one control paradigm that’s (mostly) consistently followed.

The D4 buffer is twice the size of the D3s, which had a buffer of twice the size of the D3. This means that, using lossless compression, you can shoot about 60 images at the fastest speed before the buffer fills up if you use a fast CompactFlash card. In the material that Nikon issued at the announcement of the D4, they talked about hundred images before the buffer filled using the XQD card. Since the XQD card that ships with the camera is, at 125 MB/s only slightly faster than a 100 MB/s CompactFlash card, I suspect that you have to use either a yet unannounced, faster XQD card or lossy compression, or both, to achieve the hundred image number.

The D4 still has the beautiful smooth image quality of the D3 series.

The D4 is lighter than its predecessor, but not by much. I understand the video is improved, but I’m not interested in that feature, and I’ve never used it.

My net. The D4 is a very nice camera, and is perfectly suited to my intended use. If you have a D3 or D3s that you’re happy with, I wouldn’t suggest rushing right out to upgrade.

 

The Last Word

← Rube Goldberg photography Filter frustration →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.