• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Nikon D810 long exposure noise reduction

Nikon D810 long exposure noise reduction

August 19, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

There has been some discussion on the web about long-exposure noise reduction in the Nikon D810 that occurs even when the menu setting for such process is set to off.  I have seen some indications of this kind of processing in my dark-field versus shutter speed tests.

Now that I have a tool for analyzing the spatial spectra of images, I can take a look at some of the Nikon dark-field images made when I took the data for these graphs.

First, the dark-field spectrum for the green channel, 1/8000 second at ISO 1000:

D810RN8000thG

Except at very low spatial frequencies, the spectra are flat, which indicates white noise, which means no spatial filtering.

Here’s the histogram of that image:

histo 203

There’s a little clipping at a bit over 570, and there are dropouts in the red and blue channels because of Nikon’s 14-bit digital white balance prescaling, but the histograms look normal otherwise.

Now at 15 seconds with the camera set for no long exposure noise reduction:

D810RN15s254G

There is essentially no low-pass spatial filtering taking place.

The histogram of the 15 second, no NR image:

histo 254

A little different, particularly the double-high bucket at around 600 in the red and blue channels. You’d expect this with digital prescaling, and I don’t know why it didnt’ occur with the 1/8000 second image.

Now with long exposure noise reduction invoked:

D810RN15sNRonG

Quite a bit of spatial filtering.

The histogram:

histo 306

There’s only one empty bucket. Thus, the spatial filtering is not median filtering, which cannot fill holes in the histogram; it must be some kind of averaging filter.

I’ll do some more testing and report.

 

 

The Last Word

← CCD vs CMOS: an end to the war? Nikon D810 noise reduction raw processing →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.