• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sharpness testing, part 16

Sharpness testing, part 16

November 23, 2013 JimK Leave a Comment

I set out to see if I could see the effect of the two shutter movements — one to close it and one to open it again — that happen with the Leica M240 in live view mode. I put a Novoflex M-to-F adapter on the M240. It’s a nice little piece, with a ring you can use to open and close the diaphragm, turning an attached Nikon auto-diaphragm lens into a preset one.

“What the hell,” I said, and attached a Nikon 400mm f/2.8 lens to the adapter, creating a really silly-looking combination. Actually — and this is important if you want to try this at home and don’t want to ruin your M240 — I attached the lens to the tripod, then the adapter to the Leica, then the two to the lens. At no time did the camera lens mount have to support more than the weight of the camera and the adapter. I used the rotating collar on the lens to make the horizontal and vertical images. I used a RRS Arca-Swiss compatible foot on the lens.

I made images of the scope trace with the self-timer on the M240, vertical and horizontal with live view on and off. Here are the composite raw files, cropped and with aggressive curves applied to compensate for the underexposure. Because I couldn’t back up any further, the traces are three times as long as the 135mm traces. For that reason I left the horizontal pixels alone when I prepared the images for the web, but expanded the vertical ones by a factor of three, using nearest neighbor.

Horizontal camera orientation, live view on:

400M240 h lv

Horizontal camera orientation, live view off:

400M240 h

Vertical camera orientation, live view on:

400M240 v lv

Vertical camera orientation, live view off:

400M240 v

The dark horizontal lines are the rows on the camera’s sensor that have red and green pixels. The scope doesn’t put out much red light, so the pixels under the red filters in the color filter array are pretty dark. The brighter horizontal lines are the rows on the camera’s sensor that have blue and green pixels.

The dark vertical lines are from the scope’s reticule, and are 1/10 second apart. Now we can clearly see the vibration caused by the live view shutter closing, at least when the camera is oriented vertically, which means that it’s mostly a horizontal vibration. With the tripod and head that I’m using, the vibration  excited by live view when the camera is vertical starts out at about 5 pixels peak to peak at about 10 Hz and doesn’t damp out completely during the half second that the shutter is open. The smaller — probably much smaller — vibration excited by live view when the camera is horizontal is of a higher frequency, about 40 Hz and takes about a quarter second to damp into the noise.

We can also see vibrations associated with the shutter opening. There’s not much we can do about that except get a bigger, stiffer, heavier tripod.

So, if you’re going to use really long lenses on the M240, it’s probably a good idea to turn off live view before you trip the shutter, just like you release the mirror on a SLR in similar circumstances. It’s easy to do; just hit the LV button once if you’re not using the EVF, and twice if you are.

The Last Word

← Sharpness testing, part 15 Sharpness testing, part 17 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.