• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 6

Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 6

January 7, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

In the preceding post, I tested the Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro Planar ZF mounted on a Sony a7R with the Novoflex Nikon-lens-to-E-mount adapter with the Novoflex rotating tripod collar attaching both to an Arca-Swiss Monoball head and Gitzo GT3541XLS legs, with the first set extended all the way and the next one half way. I used this setup because the Novoflex rotating tripod collar is incompatible with the RRS quick-release clamp that I use on the Arca-Swiss C1 cube; when the clamp is closed the foot can still slide back and forth. Not having the Cube makes it hard to square up the target in the frame, and further images will be made by bolting a RRS plate on the Novoflex foot with a 3/8 inch screw, and mounting that to the Cube.

In the preceding post, it looks like we were seeing vibrations in excess of one camera pixel peak-to-peak, so I wanted to make some oscilloscope photographs to see if I could pin down the nature of the vibrations. I didn’t change the tripod or head for this series, because I wanted the setup to be directly comparable to the ISO 12233 images in yesterday’s post.

Knowing that we’re looking at high-frequency vibrations, I set the scope time base to 5 msec/division, and the shutter speed to 1/40 second. That will give a trace that’s 8 divisions wide.

Here’s what I saw with the camera in the portrait position, and the scope time base moving horizontally. The image is enlarged 4x using nearest neighbor:

_DSC3228-Edit-2

We can see a vibration of about 3 pixels peak to peak, but we can’t tell too much about its nature. Enlarging the original image in Photoshop by 12x vertically and 2x horizontally using Preserve Details gives us this:

_DSC3228-Edit

You can see an underdamped vibration of about 70 Hertz with an amplitude of about two pixels peak-to-peak, with underdamped higher frequency components of roughly the same amplitude that die away faster. One of the high frequency components appears to be at about 200 Hz.

Using a function generator with the output set to sawtooth on the vertical axis of the scope and roughly the same frequency, and turning off the internal sweep generator that drove the horizontal axis in the above photographs, we can look at the horizontal motion of the camera. Here it is at 4x with nearest neighbor:

_DSC3264-Edit-3

And here’s what it looks like at 18x horizontal and 3x vertical using Preserve Details:

_DSC3264-Edit-2

The high-frequency components are less evident, but the 70 Hz component is even bigger. This squares with the results of the ISO 12233 tests in the preceding post.  The trace rises from the bottom to the top, and is not perfectly vertical.

Based on these images, it’s pretty clear why the Zeiss 100mm lens and the Novoflex collar is a difficult setup to use for the sharpest possible images on the a7R unless the shutter speed is 1/500 second or higher or ¼ second or lower. I may repeat the tests with the RRS tripod and the Cube, but I expect similar results.

The Last Word

← Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 5 Shutter slap testing with ISO 12233, part 7 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.