• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Struggles with the succulent

Struggles with the succulent

June 22, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

It’s unusual for photographers to show you their bad images. I’m no exception; while I try to learn from my mistakes, I don’t advertise them. Maybe that’s a mistake itself. If I learn from them, maybe others can, too. While my photography is idiosyncratic and unique to me, the general ideas may translate.

So, in this post I’m going to show you the results of my so-far-unsuccessful attempts to make long slit-scan exposures of the Don Worth succulent. I’m using a Betterlight Super 6K back on a Linhof Master Technika, a Nikon 120 mm f/5.6 AM-ED lens, and a B&W UV/IR cut filter (the sensor in the back has no filtration at all). The longest image the back can make is 64,000 pixels. The longest exposure time is 1/8 second. Those two numbers combine to mean that the longest continuous exposure that I can make is a little over two hours.

But I now want really long exposures. All day if I can. Mike Collette, the man behind Betterlight, has anticipated my needs and has a “time-lapse” mode whereby the camera will make a nearly-continuous series of exposures. The setting is accessed in the preferences part of the camera controller program.

I started a series of 11 one-hour exposures at 1/15 second at f/45 and ISO 200 at eight one morning. I came back at seven that evening and found that the camera had made only one exposure, even though it had made three when I tested the time-lapse setting. I looked at the preferences and found the time-lapse box unchecked. It seems to uncheck itself after a series of exposures.  Oops.

The next day I made a series of seven similar exposures. That gave me seven 60,000×6000 pixel images, which I combined into one 6000×6000 pixel image, averaging the time axis so that 70 original pixels made one in the final image. Here’s what the result looks like, with time running from the bottom to the top:

BL 357-on full

What are those horizontal stripes? In the morning, a diffuse layer of damp air came overhead. You wouldn’t really call is a cloud, since you could see right through it. However, it apparently was enough to ruin the picture.

I made a crop of the early afternoon’s pixels, which looks OK (seen here upside down, which I think gives better aesthetics):

BL 357-on late

So I salvaged something, but I really liked the longer exposure. Unless I can come up with a workaround, I’m only going to be able to make the image I’m trying for on really clear days.

The Last Word

← Fuji gets it completely wrong Trying to fix the succulent picture →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • John Griffin on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.