• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Testing for ETTR, part 9

Testing for ETTR, part 9

December 9, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

Today I set the white balance on the Sony NEX-7 to approximate the true raw histogram by photographing a magenta test image on the computer screen. The NEX-7 does not allow you to set color balance from a stored image; you must go to the Brightness/Color menu, pick White Balance, and then pick Custom Setup. You then point the camera at the magenta test target on the screen and release the shutter. The camera will complain. However, in spite of the error message, the camera stores the new white balance just fine.

You can’t tweak the result, unlike with the Nikon SLRs I’ve tested, so you need to take a picture, load it into Rawdiggger, look at the EXIF data, and see if the red and blue white balance coefficients are close enough to 1024, which is the green coefficient. If they’re not, you’ll need to modify the magenta test image by adding or subtracting red or blue. I found that converting the color space of the test image to Adobe 1998 RGB from sRGB produced less cross-color and made things go faster. The right magenta test image for me turned out to be R=150, G=64, B=112 in Adobe RGB. It produced the following coefficient values:

The error message contains the color temperature, A/B, and G/M offsets of the new white balance. For me, the numbers were 3700 degrees Kelvin, 0, and +7 green. I went back and set the white balance using the color temperature dialog to the numbers in the error message. Here’s what the EXIF data looked like after that:

So beware, the numbers in the error message are not the actual description of the white balance!

I also tested to see if going back to the saved white balance set using a test image gives the right values. Close, but not exactly:

Using a test image is a more accurate and faster approach on the NEX-7 than setting the white balance with the color temperature dialog box, and has more range.

The Last Word

← Spotmetering for ETTR — testing Testing for ETTR, part 10 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.