• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Waxing Nostalgic

Waxing Nostalgic

September 30, 2007 JimK Leave a Comment

Recently I scanned 2700 35mm slides from an archive of more than 5000. In the process, I became reacquainted with the lovely tactile qualities of that medium: the feel of the mounts in my hand, the rapid way I could go from a wide view of many images to a close inspection of one, the direct access provided by physical stacks of slides compared to the Lightroom equivalent. On the other hand, it wasn’t very long before my back developed that familiar ache from bending over a light table for hours on end. The experience got me thinking about photographic experiences I no longer have, and which ones I miss and which ones I don’t.

I miss: the delicious tinkley fizzing sound that a number 25 flashbulb makes when it goes off. I don’t miss: a) burning my fingers trying to change a flashbulb quickly, or b) paying for flashbulbs.

I miss: the smell of freshly-opened 35mm film – I wonder how many of you do or did the same thing as I routinely used to do when loading the camera: pop the top of the canister, bring the open end up to my nose, and take a deep breath. I don’t miss: having a batch of film go bad after too long a time in the back of the freezer.

I miss: going in to my local camera store at least once a week for film, paper, or chemicals, and getting to know the sales people really well. I don’t miss: worrying about working around, and the environmental impact of, things like selenium toner and just about all the Cibachrome chemicals.

I miss: the secret-society like language of asking for “four bricks of 120 CPS” at the camera store. I don’t miss: paying for film.

I miss: the feeling of satisfaction after spotting a print just right. I don’t miss: a) throwing away a print after making a spotting error, b) trying to spot out a cigarette butt in a light foreground, or c) dealing with the black spots that come from dust on negative film before the exposure.

I miss: the precise feeling of the controls of all-mechanical cameras, especially 35mm rangefinder cameras. I don’t miss: the viewfinder (im)precision of those cameras.

I miss: the satisfaction of being able to focus quickly and accurately using a single-lens reflex camera, and, with the right focusing screen, having focusing and framing be completely independent from each other. I don’t miss: out-of-focus images in fast-moving situations. As an aside, I can’t manually focus like I once could; automatic focusing is a real boon to aged eyes.

I miss: the isolated, peaceful, Zen feeling of working in the darkroom. I don’t miss: the isolated, lonely, cut-off-from-my family feeling of working in a darkroom.

I miss: the ballet of graceful dodging and burning to the beat of a metronome. I don’t miss: working for forty-five minutes just to get back to where I was when I left the darkroom the day before.

I miss: Super-XX, Perutz 17, Tri-X, Agfa 25 in Rodinol, and Ektar 25. I don’t miss: Plus-X, Techical Pan, Panatomic-X, Ektachrome 160, or Ansco 100.

I miss: Velox, Azo, Portriga Rapid, and Seagull VC. I don’t miss: Kodabromide, Polycontrast, Medalist, or any of the RC papers.

I miss: buying a camera and knowing it won’t be obsolete for a long time.

The Last Word

← Grace Under Pressure Leica →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.