• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Why photography projects keep getting harder

Why photography projects keep getting harder

March 1, 2008 JimK Leave a Comment

[The idea for this post came up when I was interviewing Jerry Takigawa several years ago. All credit for this piece should go to Jerry. If you’ve got a beef with it, blame me.]

You start a photographic project. Maybe you stumbled into it by accident; maybe you planned it out meticulously well in advance. It’s going great. You’re really happy with the work, and you’ve gotten into a groove. Then, slowly, over months or years, you notice that it gets harder and harder to get really good images. You can’t figure out why. You’re doing what got you to this point. You haven’t fallen into a rut. You’re still excited about the project. You still see new things. You’re just not getting as many keepers as you used to.

Jerry points out that this is natural, and it’s caused by your body of finished work not expanding as rapidly as your production of new images. As you start the project, every good picture goes into the “exhibit someday” pile. When you get twenty five or fifty exhibitable images, you start pruning. You put two pictures in, but take one out that you don’t like so much anymore. Sometimes, you go through and throw out a whole class of images (see the previous post). Over time, the quality of the pictures in the keepers pile goes up. It’s no wonder that it gets harder and harder to create images that make the cut.

Not only does the general quality of the images get higher the longer the project progresses, but certain niches with room for only one image get filled. I returned from a photographic trip in October pretty darned happy about the work I did, but I found that I couldn’t use the very best picture from the trip; it was too similar to a slightly better image that I’d made in April.

So cheer up. Your pictures aren’t getting worse. Your standards are getting higher.

The Last Word

← When good pictures turn bad How well do you need to know your camera? →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.