• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / GFX 100 II, X2D auto-focusing with dark EVFs

GFX 100 II, X2D auto-focusing with dark EVFs

January 8, 2024 JimK 6 Comments

In a previous post, I compared the autofocus performance of the FujiFilm GFX 100 II with the GF 110 mm f/2 lens to that of the Hasselblad X2D with the XCD 90V lens when shooting family portraits, and found that the X2D autofocus failed to achieve focus in situations that the GFX 100 II handled with ease. I noted that one of those situations was backlighting. I’ll be doing some more work with that, but in this post I”m going to see how finder brightness affects the ability of the two cameras to achieve automatic focus.

I sorted through my target collection and found a target that Horshack created to be easy for AF systems to deal with. I printed two versions of the target, one low contrast and dark, and the other even lower contrast and darker. I taped them to a wall about 6 feet from where I set up the cameras.

 

 

 

 

I set up the cameras this way:

  • Manual shutter and aperture
  • Mechanical shutter for the X2D, EFCS for the GFX 100 II
  • ISO 400
  • f/8
  • IBIS on
  • EVF exposure simulation on

I varied the shutter speed until I found the fastest shutter speed (and thus the darkest finder) where the AF system was able to acquire focus.

  • For the low contrast target: X2D, 1/320 second. GFX 100 II, 1/4000 second. Actually, in the case of the GFX 100 II, I don’t know if it would still AF at a faster shutter speed.
  • For the even lower contrast target: The X2D couldn’t focus at any shutter speed. GFX 100 II, 1/4000 second. In the case of the GFX 100 II, I don’t know if it would still AF at a faster shutter speed.

I tried again at ISO 100:

  • For the low contrast target: X2D, 1/100 second. GFX 100 II, 1/4000 second. Actually, in the case of the GFX 100 II, I don’t know if it would still AF at a faster shutter speed.
  • For the even lower contrast target: The X2D couldn’t focus at any shutter speed. GFX 100 II, 1/4000 second. In the case of the GFX 100 II, I don’t know if it would still AF at a faster shutter speed.

So finder brightness makes a big difference with the X2D. As a check on that, I set the X2D EVF exposure preview to off. Then it could focus on both targets at ISO 100 at 1/4000 second.

Caveats: Preproduction version of the 90V, lens firmware 1.4.9.

 

GFX 100 II, X2D

← Family photography with the X2D/XCD90V and the GFX 100 II/GF110 Visible noise and CFA filter spectra, part one →

Comments

  1. Bob Foster says

    January 12, 2024 at 10:50 am

    Thank you.

    My XCD 120 is by far the worst performing XCD lens insofar as auto-focus is concerned.

    I duplicated your test with this lens and obtained similar results.

    Compared to better lighting conditions and/or better contrast in the subject the speed with which the lens acquires focus does not appear to be affected. I suspect, but do not know, that this lens used in combination with the X2D camera uses smaller step sizes than other XCD lenses to determine best focus.

    Reply
  2. Alberto Lau Chang says

    January 16, 2024 at 8:01 pm

    Thank you for your informative posts, Mr. Kasson!

    I rented a Hasselblad X2D 100C camera, an XCD 38mm f2.5V lens, and an SCD 90mm f2.5V lens for two weeks over the holidays. While I was impressed by the quality of the files, focusing performance left a lot to be desired in both auto and manual modes. The new face recognition firmware helps, but it still misses occasionally and sometimes crucially. This is unacceptable in such an expensive camera.

    I am specially disappointed because back in the film days I loved my Hasselblad 500C and my Super Wide. Yes, I know they were manual-focus cameras, but I did not have any problem focusing.

    DJI, the drone maker and current owner of Hasselblad, seems to just want to profit off past glory. Didn’t DJI come out with products that use LiDAR to focus? Why don’t they lavish that kind of love on Hasselblad?

    Reply
  3. Riswan says

    January 26, 2024 at 2:57 am

    Hi jim, thanks for the findings, are you suggesting that turning off exposure simulation actually help with the AF on X2D? Especially indoor when room is dimmed?

    Im using 55v and with face detection, i found it when X2D gets focused, at times it will be on the farther side of the eye too unlike what most people claim

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 26, 2024 at 7:22 am

      …are you suggesting that turning off exposure simulation actually help with the AF on X2D?

      If the subject is dark in the finder, yes.

      Reply
  4. Gary Halvin says

    July 8, 2024 at 6:58 pm

    For the x2d, is turning off exposure simulation still the solution for faster auto focus with current firmware?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 8, 2024 at 7:12 pm

      It still seems to help if the finder image is dark otherwise.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.