• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Compromise AF Adjust for the 70-200/2.8E on D850

Compromise AF Adjust for the 70-200/2.8E on D850

January 16, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Nikon D850.  The series starts here. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “D850”.

In this post, I’m going to take everything I’ve — and, if you’ve been reading along, we — have learned about the AF Adjustments on the D850, and apply that knowledge in an attempt to come up with a compromise AF Adjustment setting that works for focal lengths of 70, 105, and 200 mm, and f-stops of f/2.8 through f/8 in 1/3 stop increments.

I set the camera’s AF Adjustment to 0 and made test exposure runs of ten shots each at each of the possible variations of f-stop and focal length. Here are the resulting focus plane errors, sorted by focal length:

 

 

The lens is biased toward front-focusing, as shown by all those negative numbers on the vertical axis. It looks like to correct the lens wide open, we need to move the focussed plane by about 35 micrometers (um) towards backfocusing. That will overcorrect us at 200, and undercorrect at 70 mm. We could then hope that depth of field (DOF) will save us as we stop down. 

Before we do that, let’s look at the circles of confusion (CoC) implied by the above curves.

 

 

Now here are the CoCs with a 35 um shift simulated:

 

 

 

Looks like that’s a bit too much, but we now have the worst-case mean error down to about two pixels, which ain’t bad, in endeavors where close-enough counts, like horseshoes, hand grenades, and PDAF.

It should be possible to automate the process of picking the compromise AF Adjustment value that minimizes either the simple sum of the errors or the rms error over the sample set. But here’s the problem with just turning the whole thing over to a machine. In going through this exercise, I now understand the tradeoffs of aperture and focal length, and I’ve decided that the chances that I’m going to use this lens wide open as 70 mm are somewhere between slim and none, so I’m going to try a 25 um shift.

When we do that, here’s what results:

 

 

 

I think that’s as good as it’s gonna get.

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Further adventures in observer metameric failure a7RIII AF accuracy with the 70-200/4 and 100-400 lenses →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.