• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji 32-64/4@64mm tilt, field curvature, & astigmatism

Fuji 32-64/4@64mm tilt, field curvature, & astigmatism

August 4, 2017 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of the development of a simple, relatively foolproof, astigmatism, field curvature, and field tilt test for lens screening. The first post is here. It is also the second post in a series of tests of the Fujifilm 32-64 mm f/4 G-mount lens for the GFX 50s. That test starts here.

Brandon Dube, who is an expert on lens design, has made some comments on the images here, and I’ve included them at the bottom of this post. Obviously, he is seeing things that I can’t see in this test, at least at present. I hope that I can learn to get some of what Brandon gets out of these Siemens Star tests, and explain it to you so that you can have that benefit as well.

I wanted to test the lens at 64 mm, I found a place where I could get 25 meters away from the target:

Consulting my handy-dandy chart, it appears that 25 m is not far enough to get the defocus component of the corner blur down to 3 micrometers wide open, but f/5.6 is fine:

Here are enlarged 238×192 pixel crops at the center, and all eight major peripheral compass points.

Center

Either the lens is less sharp at 64mm than it is at 32 and 50 mm (and it was sharper at 32 mm than at 50 mm), or I misfocused slightly. [Addendum: As I found out later, this slight loss in sharpness has to be the result of misfocusing; the lens is amazingly sharp on axis at f/5.6.] You can see a bit of aliasing, but nowhere near as much as in the sets that I posted yesterday. But that’s not what’s important for these tests. I have much better ways to assess on-axis sharpness, and I will show you results from those tests soon.

Moving clockwise around the periphery starting in the upper left corner:

Upper Left

 

Upper Center

 

Upper Right

 

Center Right

 

Lower Right

 

Lower Center

 

Lower Left

 

Center Left

 

There are some small systematic differences, but in general, this lens shows little focus tilt and astigmatism and has a usefully flat field.

Here are Brandon’s comments:

…you can see the astigmatism is oriented along the -10 degree or so axis with respect to the x direction.  The upper center has about the same orientation, but a lower magnitude.  The upper right has reduced magnitude and orientation very close to the x axis.  Center right is uniform defocus, this is (or is near) a node of the astigmatism field.  Same for the lower right.

The lower center is also a region of low astigmatism, and also low Petzval/field curvature in general.  The lower left is astigmatic along about +45 deg, and the center left is not very astigmatic.

 

 

 

 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fuji 32-64/4 tilt, field curvature, & astigmatism Organizing the new Hartnell show →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.