• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Hasselblad HC 150/3.2 on Fuji GFX

Hasselblad HC 150/3.2 on Fuji GFX

April 3, 2017 JimK 4 Comments

This is the 24th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

I’ve got one last HC lens to try on the GFX, the 150mm f/3.2.

Shutter set to EFCS, with the GFX switching by itself to mechanical shutter at the highest shutter speeds, which were 1/4000 with the lens wide open.  ISO set to 400 to keep the shutter speeds up, as there was a little wind. Apertures from f/3.2 to f/11 in whole stops except for the first step. I focused three times at each aperture, and picked the sharpest images. I am getting so good with the Fuji EVF focusing that all the images at a given f-stop are now routinely the same sharpness, but I keep at the exercise of making multiple exposures in case I slip up.  2-second self-timer. Arca-Swiss C1 cube on RRS sticks. Focus was upper-center at a distance of 57 meters, as measured by my new Nikon rangefinder. All images were refocused at each aperture. Daylight white balance selected in Lightroom; all other Lr settings at default.

The overall scene, wide open:

There is very little light falloff, as this lens was made for a much larger sensor.

In the middle, at the focus point:

f/3.2

That’s a tad soft.

Here’s how to use these highly-magnified crops. The dimensions of the GFX sensor are 8256×6192 pixels. If we make a full-frame print from the GFX on a printer with 360 pixels per inch native driver-level resolution, like the Epson inkjet printers, we’ll end up with a 23×17 inch (58×44 cm) print. The 318×246 pixel crop you’re looking at will end up 0.8333×0.6833 inches (2.12×1.74 cm). Let’s imagine that you or your viewers are critical, and will look at the 22×17 inch print from about 18 inches (conventional wisdom is that the distance would be a little greater than that, or 28 inches (the diagonal), but you did buy a high-resolution camera for a reason, didn’t you?).

The next step is dependent on your monitor pitch, which you may or may not know. Turns out, you don’t have to know it. Just take the 253% crops and view then at 1:1. How high are they? Get out your ruler and measure, or just guess. Let’s say they are 6 inches high. 6 inches is about 7 times 0.8333, so in order to view the crops the way they’d look from 18 inches on the print is to view them from 7 times as far away, or 10.5 feet.

Everything here scales proportionately. If the image on your screen is bigger than 6 inches, increase your viewing distance by the ratio of your image height to 6 inches. If you think your viewers are going to almost get their nose to that print and look at it from six inches, divide that 10.5 feet by 3, and look at the image on the monitor from three and a half feet away.

On a 30 inch 4K display, a 1:1 presentation of these crops will be about 4 inches, so to simulate the effect of viewing the print from 18 inches, you’ll want to back up to about seven feet. A couple of feet for a 6 inch print viewing distance. On a 17 inch laptop 4K display, a 1:1 presentation of these crops will be about 2 inches, so to simulate the effect of viewing the print from 18 inches, you’ll want to back up to about three and a half feet. A foot for a 6 inch print viewing distance.

 

f/4

That’s looking pretty good.

 

f/5.6

 

f/8

 

 

 

f/11

Diffraction is hurting us a tad at f/11.

Some people have asked for some objects with more straight lines. Here’s a set of crops in the center left:

f/3.2

 

f/4

 

f/5.6

 

f/8

 

f/11

I personally don’t find those as instructive, but there they are.

Moving to the far right middle edge:

f/3.2

There’s a fair amount of softness here, but it’s definitely usable for a lot of things.

f/4

Just two-thirds a stop brings significant improvement.

f/5.6

About the same.

f/8

a bit better.

f/11

Pretty much the same.

In the extreme upper left corner:

f/3.2

Some softness, but I expected worse.

f/4

A nice improvement

f/5.6

About the same.

f/8

Not much difference

f/11

Again, not much difference.

This is credible performance from a lens meant to cover a much larger sensor.

 

 

 

 

 

GFX 50S

← Hasselblad HC 50-110/3.5-4.5 @ 50 & 110 mm on Fuji GFX Fujifilm GFX-50S electronic shutter speed →

Comments

  1. Michael Fang says

    September 16, 2019 at 1:31 pm

    Thanks for the test Jim!

    Was this the 150mm f/3.2 N or the older one (without the “N” designation)?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      September 16, 2019 at 1:52 pm

      The older one.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Hassselblad 150/3.2 on Fujiflim GFX-50S says:
    April 3, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    […] Hasselblad HC 150/3.2 on Fuji GFX […]

    Reply
  2. Fujifilm GFX 50S For Wine Lovers, GF120 Lens Review and More | Fuji Addict says:
    April 4, 2017 at 8:15 am

    […] The Last Word – Hasselblad HC 150/3.2 on Fuji GFX […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.