• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / D850 / Nikon D850 focus shift with 105/1.4

Nikon D850 focus shift with 105/1.4

November 8, 2017 JimK 4 Comments

This is the tenth post in a series of Nikon D850 tests. The series starts here.

The D850 has a feature that will allow the camera to do automatic focus bracketing with AF lenses. You focus the camera to the minimum distance that you want, tell it how many steps and the (not absolute) distance between them, and turn the camera loose. The camera makes successive exposures, focusing slightly further away for each one. The change in distance is dependent on the focal length and f-stop, and only the camera knows how it juggles those things. 

I decided to try the feature with the 105 mm f/1.5 Nikon lens on the same target that I’d used for the autofocus tests. I hoped to:

  • Learn how to use the feature
  • Discover what the maximum sharpness of the lens is at the distance and f-stops I used for the AF tests.
  • Get an idea how the step distance changed with f-stop.
  • See if this would work for measuring LoCA  and peak sharpness with targets too far away to attempt with the Cognisys rail

But before I got to that point, I had a fight with the camera. When I went to set up the feature, the menu item was grayed out:

And when I tried to invoke it anyway, I got this not-very-informative message:

 

I floundered around for a few minutes without success, then posted a question on DPR. Within a couple of hours, I had my answer: the feature doesn’t work if the date and time haven’t been set. I hadn’t bothered because I was just testing the camera, but I set those things, and the time zone to boot, and was on my merry way.

Here’s a sample shot of my chosen target:

Here are the details:

  • Nikon 105mm f/1.4 on D850.
  • ISO 64
  • Focus shift, silent shutter option
  • 100 steps 
  • Minimum step size (1)
  • Aperture exposure mode
  • f/1.4 through f/f/5.6 in whole stops
  • Wescott LED panels set to 5500 K.
  • Target distance, 3 meters.

I used Fast Raw Viewer to discard the really out of focus images, and put the rest through my processing pipeline: dcraw in document mode, MTF Mapper, Matlab, and Excel.

Here are the MTF50s for each raw color plane for f/1.4:

The vertical axis is MTF50, measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph). The shot taken with the lens focused to the closest position is on the left, numbered step 0. There are 20 more exposures plotted. There is no way to know the focused distance for these exposures. You can see that the steps are much larger than the ones I use when I’m measuring LoCA and focus shift with the razor blade and the Cognisys rail. I ended up throwing away 80 images from each set.

The rest of the f-stops:

 

 

 

 

A few things stand out:

  • The curves don’t get wider as you stop down, indicating that the camera is making the steps bigger as you stop down. 
  • You wouldn’t want to use a step much wider than 1 for this lens at this distance if you wanted to have at least one exposure at the peak sharpness the lens can deliver
  • This target is not a sharp as the razor blade that I have been using for LoCA testing
  • The LoCA is shown by this test, but the longitudinal misfocusing can’t be compared to other lenses directly since we don’t know the step size.
  • You can’t measure focus shift this way because, at the end of the run, the camera does not return the lens to the starting focussed distance.

This is very encouraging. I will write a follow-on post that says what we can learn about the camera’s AF performance with this lens based on these results.

 

D850

← More on Nikon D850 PDAF with the 105/1.4 Comparing D850 105/1.4 AF with MF results →

Comments

  1. Eric Calabros says

    November 8, 2017 at 10:14 pm

    Can you check focus breathing? I’m hearing its focal length is less than 105mm wide open.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 9, 2017 at 7:11 am

      It is indeed. It’s an internal focusing lens, so that makes sense.

      Reply
  2. AndrewZ says

    November 9, 2017 at 4:48 am

    You’re not using the silent shutter for these tests (the option says off)? Would seem to make sense otherwise you’re using up shutter life for no benefit as the targets are static.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 9, 2017 at 7:10 am

      I did use silent shutter. That is specified in another menu in the Focus Shift Shooting setup screens, where it overrides other settings.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.