• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / 2025 / May / Archives for 12th

Archives for May 12, 2025

Choosing a Target for Photon Transfer Curve (PTC) Analysis

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

The Photon Transfer Curve (PTC) is a foundational tool in sensor characterization, offering insight into read noise, shot noise, and PRNU by plotting variance versus signal level. But to get clean, meaningful data — especially across the full dynamic range — the choice of target matters. A well-designed target can dramatically improve sampling density and… [Read More]

The Last Word

Input-Referred Noise in Image Sensors

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

When evaluating sensor performance, it’s useful to express all noise sources in terms of their equivalent number of input electrons: the physical signal that initiated the chain of image formation. This concept, known as input-referred noise, allows us to compare different sensors, modes, and ISOs on a consistent basis. Image sensors measure light by converting… [Read More]

The Last Word

Pixel Response Non-Uniformity: Fixed Pattern Noise in the Light

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

In the previous post, I looked at photon shot noise, a fundamental noise source arising from the quantum nature of light. Today I’ll examine a different kind of noise: one that’s not random from frame to frame, but rather baked into the sensor itself: Pixel Response Non-Uniformity, or PRNU. PRNU refers to pixel-to-pixel variation in… [Read More]

The Last Word

Photon Noise and the Role of Quantum Efficiency

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

One of the most fundamental sources of noise in digital imaging sensors is photon shot noise, arising from the discrete and probabilistic nature of light. Even under perfectly stable illumination, the number of photons arriving at a sensor site over a fixed integration time fluctuates due to quantum randomness. This phenomenon obeys Poisson statistics. In… [Read More]

The Last Word

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.