• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sony a7RII — FPRN

Sony a7RII — FPRN

April 1, 2016 JimK Leave a Comment

I reported on fixed pattern read noise testing with the D5 in the last post. Since I hadn’t done this kind of testing before, I thought I’d try it with a camera that I know well, the Sony a7RII.

I made 128 identical dark-field exposures at 1/8000 second, averaged them, and looked at the results.  I used ISO 100, the base ISO, ISO 640, the first ISO with the increased conversion gain, and ISO 6400 a setting where there is a lot of analog gain that should show what’s going on on the sensor side of the amplifiers.

Here’s the output from the ISO 100 image set.

a7rii fpn iso 100

Except for the lower absolute value, this looks about like the D5, except that there is a pattern developing in the blue channel.

ISO 640:

a7rii fpn iso 640

Sort of the same thing, except that the conversion gain change has given the blue channel a new lease on life.

ISO 6400:

a7rii fpn iso 6400

There’s an error in the caption on the graph. Those are indeed the ISO 6400 values. I’ll fix that soon. Like we saw in the D5, there is a pattern developing at the higher ISOs. This one is even further down than the one in the D5.

The red ISO 100 histogram-equalized raw channel, which shows the most patterning at all ISOs:

 

AvdEqBP1

The red ISO 640 raw channel:

AvdEqBP1

The red ISO 6400 raw channel:

AvdEqBP1

You can see something happening running down the center of the images., and, if you use your imagination running across the centers Since these images are 600×600 central crops, the center of these images is the center of the chip. Are we seeing the results of stepping exposure of the photo-resists when the chip was made? Could be, but it’s way down there.

I don’t think that FPRN is a problem in the a7RII.

The Last Word

← Nikon D5 — FPRN Nikon D5 — pushing ISO 100 images →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.