• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z9 / Nikon Z9 RN, FWC, PDR

Nikon Z9 RN, FWC, PDR

January 28, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z9. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z9”.

Alphabet soup in the post title, huh? I’ll unpack it for you. RN is read noise, which is the image noise that exists independent of the light collected by the sensor. FWC is full well capacity, which is the number of electrons that onoe pixel of the sensor can hold at full scale at base ISO. PDR is photographic dynamic range, which is full scale over the mean signal level that produces a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 16000 over the image height in pixels.

FWC and RN are of interest mostly only to photo-nerds, but they figure into the calculation of PDR, which is relevant to everyday photography, and to normalized SNR curves, which are a more general way to get an understanding of a camera’s shadow noise characteristics.

We’ll do the nerdy stuff first.

This shows the result of calculating base ISO FWC by looking at images made by the camera at various ISO settings. The FWC of each raw channel is shown. Because of Nikon’s white balance prescaling, the red and blue raw channels measure lower than the two green channels. When I squint my eyes and look at the chart, if seems like the FWC for the camera is about 60,000 electrons. That is quite respectable.

 

The FWC of the Z9 in terms of electrons per unit area is about the same as the Z7II.

Here’s the read noise:

This is input-referred read noise, which calculates the gain in the camera’s signal processing chain, and states the noise in terms of electron count at the pixel. The vertical and horizontal scales are logarithmic. The Z9 is essentially ISOless for ISO 64 through 400, and at ISO 500 through 16000, which is as high as I went with this calculation. The ISO 64 noise is not up to the state of the art for modern sensors, and shows that some sacrifices for the speed of the Z9 stacked sensor design have been made. The RN from ISO 500 on up is right up there with the cameras that have similar pixel pitch.

OK, now the the stuff that matters to working photographers.

Let’s dissect the above graph. The crosses are measured points. The lines are what a camera model that I fitted to the data says the SNR should be. The horizontal axis is the mean signal level in stops from full scale. The vertical axis is the signal to noise ratio (SNR) normalized to a 1600-pixel-high print.  The black line at 3.3 marks Bill Claff’s PDR threshold (log base 2 of 10 is 3.3). The Claff PDR is measured by looking at where each curve crosses the black horizontal line. On the right side of the graph, the most important determinant of the SNR is the full well capacity (FWC) of the camera. On the left, the read noise comes into play. Higher is better. The top curve is for ISO 64, and the curves follow down as the ISO increases.

The PDR at base ISO is a bit less than 11.5 stops. Bill says 11.3, so, as usual, we pretty much agree.

Here are the curves for the high ISOs:

 

The PDR at ISO 16000 is a bit less than 5 stops. Bill says 4.5 stops.

The Z7 switches from low conversion gain to high conversion gain at the transition from ISO 400 to ISO 500. Let’s look at those two curves.

At ISO 400, an ETTR exposure will have a better (higher) SNR than an ETTR exposure at ISO 500 for tones brighter than 6 stops down from full scale, but a worse SNR for tones darker than that. The part of the curves that are bent are the parts where read noise is most significant, and the parts that are straight are the parts where photon noise is most significant. You can see that the read noise affects the ISO 400 curve quite a bit, and that the ISO 500 curve is hardly affect by read noise at all.

 

Z9

← How fast is the Z9 shutter? Nikon Z9 static finder latency →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.