• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Pixel Response Non-Uniformity: Fixed Pattern Noise in the Light

Pixel Response Non-Uniformity: Fixed Pattern Noise in the Light

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

In the previous post, I looked at photon shot noise, a fundamental noise source arising from the quantum nature of light. Today I’ll examine a different kind of noise: one that’s not random from frame to frame, but rather baked into the sensor itself: Pixel Response Non-Uniformity, or PRNU. PRNU refers to pixel-to-pixel variation in a sensor’s sensitivity to light. Even under perfectly uniform illumination, some pixels produce slightly higher or lower signals than others. These variations are systematic, not random, and persist across images. Unlike shot noise, which averages out with repeated exposures, PRNU is a form of fixed pattern noise and cannot be reduced by temporal averaging, unless you use calibration techniques or dithering.

Suppose we illuminate a sensor with uniform light resulting in an average of S photoelectrons per pixel (assuming QE is factored in). Each pixel has a slightly different gain, which we model as a random variable gᵢ centered around 1.0:

gᵢ = 1 + δᵢ, where δᵢ ~ N(0, σ_PRNU)

Then the output signal for pixel i is:

xᵢ = gᵢ * S = (1 + δᵢ) * S

This implies that:

  • Mean(xᵢ) = S
  • Var(xᵢ) = σ_PRNU² * S²

So PRNU introduces a signal-dependent noise term that grows quadratically with the signal level, unlike shot noise, which grows linearly (variance = S).

PRNU vs. Photon Noise

To compare the two:

  • Photon noise standard deviation = √S
  • PRNU noise standard deviation = σ_PRNU * S

The crossover point, where PRNU becomes equal in magnitude to photon noise, occurs when:

σ_PRNU * S = √S
→ S = 1 / σ_PRNU²

For example, if σ_PRNU = 1% (0.01), PRNU becomes dominant above S = 10,000 electrons.

At low light levels, shot noise dominates, and PRNU is negligible. At high light levels, PRNU dominates, limiting the effectiveness of averaging or increased exposure. PRNU manifests as a pattern in flat-field images: the brighter the image, the more visible the pattern.

PRNU is often calibrated out during sensor characterization. This involves:

  • Capturing a uniform illumination image (a flat field).
  • Computing pixel-wise gain corrections.
  • Applying inverse gains during image processing.

But PRNU calibration assumes stability over time and temperature. In some sensors, it drifts.

Equation Summary

  • Signal per pixel: xᵢ = (1 + δᵢ) * S
  • PRNU variance: Var_PRNU = σ_PRNU² * S²
  • Photon noise variance: Var_photon = S
  • Total signal variance (excluding read noise):
    Var_total ≈ S + σ_PRNU² * S²
  • This leads to a nonlinear SNR curve that rolls off at high signal levels due to PRNU.

Plotting SNR vs. Mean Signal

An alternative and, at least to me, more intuitive form of the Photon Transfer Curve plots the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) against the mean signal level.

  • X-axis: Mean signal (in electrons)
  • Y-axis: SNR = mean / standard deviation

This plot directly illustrates how well a signal stands out from noise across the sensor’s dynamic range.

Using the same model for total variance:

σ²_total = σ_read² + S + σ_PRNU² × S²

The SNR is:

SNR(S) = S / sqrt(σ_read² + S + σ_PRNU² × S²)

This expression transitions through three regimes:

Read Noise–Limited (Low Signal)

    SNR ≈ S / σ_read
Linear growth with signal.

Photon Shot Noise–Limited (Mid Signal)

SNR ≈ sqrt(S)
Square root growth — this is the fundamental quantum limit.

PRNU-Limited (High Signal)

SNR ≈ 1 / σ_PRNU
SNR saturates — increasing exposure yields no benefit once PRNU dominates.

Advantages of the SNR Variant

  • More directly aligned with perceptual quality and dynamic range.
  • Shows clearly where further exposure stops yielding SNR benefit.
  • Useful for comparing different sensors or signal processing pipelines.

PRNU is a reminder that not all noise is random. While photon shot noise stems from nature, PRNU is a manufacturing imperfection. It matters most when signals are strong and noise should be low, and it sets a ceiling on the ultimate image quality from a sensor unless corrected.

I should mention that, in real world photography with modern CMOS sensors, I have not found PRNU to be significant.

The Last Word

← Photon Noise and the Role of Quantum Efficiency Input-Referred Noise in Image Sensors →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.