• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Read Noise in CMOS Sensors: dual conversion gain

Read Noise in CMOS Sensors: dual conversion gain

May 12, 2025 JimK Leave a Comment

Read noise sets the lower limit of a sensor’s usable dynamic range. It encompasses all noise sources between the pinned photodiode (PPD) and the final digital output. For modern CMOS sensors, this path is often split into two readout modes via dual conversion gain (DCG).

Read noise includes:

  • Reset noise at the floating diffusion (kTC noise),
  • Source follower transistor noise,
  • Thermal and flicker noise in downstream circuitry,
  • PGA (programmable gain amplifier) noise, and
  • ADC quantization and comparator noise.

The total noise at the output of the ADC can be referred back to the input (PPD) in electrons RMS using the conversion gain (e⁻/DN).

DCG sensors switch between two analog gain modes:

  • High Conversion Gain (HCG):
    • Increases voltage per electron.
    • Reduces input-referred read noise.
    • Sacrifices full well capacity.
    • Used atlow ISO settings.
  • Low Conversion Gain (LCG):
    • Reduces voltage per electron.
    • Increases full well capacity.
    • Read noise is higher in electrons, but digitization spans more charge.
    • Used at high ISO or bright scenes.

This gain switch typically occurs just before the PGA and ADC.

Let’s suppose you have the following:

Mode Conversion Gain (e⁻/DN) Read Noise (DN) Read Noise (e⁻)
HCG 0.30 2.0 0.6
LCG 2.40 1.5 3.6
  • HCG is ideal for dark scenes — it minimizes read noise at the expense of full well capacity.
  • LCG is ideal for bright scenes — it allows higher signals without clipping, at the cost of more read noise.

Implications for Input-Referred Noise

Since conversion gain changes, the same output noise in DN implies different input-referred noise in electrons:

σ_input = σ_output × CG

Any analysis of read noise must include:

  • Which gain mode was used,
  • The corresponding conversion gain,
  • Whether the mode switch was automatic or manual.

Best Practices for Measuring Read Noise with DCG Sensors

  1. Force ISO to control gain mode
  2. Capture dark frames for each gain mode to isolate read noise.
  3. Use flat-field pairs to compute conversion gain for each mode.
  4. Build separate PTCs for HCG and LCG regimes.
  5. Detect the transition point, where dynamic switching may occur.

Dual conversion gain allows image sensors to operate closer to the photon-limited ideal in both bright and dark scenes. But it adds complexity to noise analysis: what looks like a clean, continuous curve might hide a sharp gain-mode transition with very different noise characteristics.

Understanding and accounting for DCG is essential for accurate characterization of input-referred noise in today’s high-performance CMOS sensors.

 

The Last Word

← Photon Transfer Curves: a unifying tool for analyzing sensor noise What cooling can, and can’t, do for CMOS read noise →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.