• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 50 Summilux & 55 Otus/Sony a7S corner crops

50 Summilux & 55 Otus/Sony a7S corner crops

July 10, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Here are crops of the upper right corner of the images from the preceding post.

50 Summilux f/1.4
50 Summilux f/1.4
Otus 55mm f/1.4
Otus 55mm f/1.4

Both are darkened by the corner falloff — usual for f/1.4 lenses used wide open. It’s clear that there is something seriously wrong with the Summilux on this camera.

50 Summilux f/2
50 Summilux f/2
Otus 55mm f/2
Otus 55mm f/2

Getting better, but the Leica lens still has serious problems at f/2. Or, shall I say, the camera has serious problems getting the best out of this lens at f/2.

 

50 Summilux f/2.8
50 Summilux f/2.8
Otus 55mm f/2.8
Otus 55mm f/2.8

Still problems with the Leica lens.

50 Summilux f/4
50 Summilux f/4
Otus 55mm f/4
Otus 55mm f/4

The Leica is almost as good as the Otus at f/4.

50 Summilux f/5.6
50 Summilux f/5.6
Otus 55mm f/5.6
Otus 55mm f/5.6

The Leica lens is pretty sharp at f/5.6, but doesn’t have the contrast of the Zeiss lens. That’s not the camera; that’s the nature of the two lenses.

50 Summilux f/8
50 Summilux f/8
Otus 55mm f/8
Otus 55mm f/8

Both are pretty sharp. Zeiss is more contrasty.

50 Summilux f/11
50 Summilux f/11
Otus 55mm f/11
Otus 55mm f/11

Both are pretty sharp. Zeiss is more contrasty. Just like f/8.

50 Summilux f/16
50 Summilux f/16
Otus 55mm f/16
Otus 55mm f/16

Diffraction is softening both images, but the Zeiss lens retains its contrast edge.

The Last Word

← 50 Summilux & 55 Otus on the Sony a7S Leica 24mm Elmar-M on Sony a7S →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • John Griffin on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.