the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / 50 Summilux & 55 Otus on the Sony a7S

50 Summilux & 55 Otus on the Sony a7S

July 10, 2014 By JimK Leave a Comment

After yesterday’s test of the Leica 28 mm f/2.8 Elmarit ASPH I’m no longer sanguine about how rangefinder lenses — which, fo me means Leica M-mount lenses — will do on the Sony a7S. I think each one has to be tried, at least until the focal lengths exceed 75 or 90mm.

I thought I’d try a lens that had given me trouble on the Sony a7R, the Leica 50 mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH. This is a lens that is very sharp in the center on just about any camera, and is more than respectable in the corners on the Leica 240.

For comparison, I picked the Zeiss 55 mm f/1.4 Otus Distagon in a Nikon F-mount. This is the sharpest lens I own in the corners.

I made Expodisc images wide open — the toughest aperture for corner casts — with both lenses.

 

Leica 50mm Summilux
Leica 50mm Summilux

 

Zeiss 55 mm Otus
Zeiss 55 mm Otus

Virtually no corner casts in either case. This is something the a7S seems to do consistently well.

I set up on this scene:

_DSC2848

I made a complete aperture series with both lenses. Here are some tight center crops the include a Linhof Master Technika that happened to be making a series of exposures.

 

50mm Summilux f/1.4
50mm Summilux f/1.4
55mm Otus f/1.4
55mm Otus f/1.4
50mm Summilux f/2
50mm Summilux f/2
55mm Otus f/2
55mm Otus f/2

 

50mm Summilux f/2.8
50mm Summilux f/2.8
55mm Otus f/2.8
55mm Otus f/2.8
50mm Summilux f/4
50mm Summilux f/4
55mm Otus f/4
55mm Otus f/4
50mm Summilux f/5.6
50mm Summilux f/5.6
50mm Summilux f/8
50mm Summilux f/8

 

55mm Otus f/8
55mm Otus f/8
50mm Summilux f/11
50mm Summilux f/11
55mm Otus f/11
55mm Otus f/11
50mm Summilux f/16
50mm Summilux f/16
55mm Otus f/16
55mm Otus f/16

Well, that’s not very revealing, is it? All the images are limited by the resolution of the sensor.

Next up, the upper right corner. There we’ll see some differences.

← Leica 28mm f/2.8 Elmarit on the Sony a7S… 50 Summilux & 55 Otus/Sony a7S corner crops →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

April 2021
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • CarVac on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • JimK on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Pixel shift with the Fujifilm GFX 100S
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • JimK on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • John Leathwick on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • Christer Almqvist on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • JimK on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • Tom Hegeman on Three dimensionality and sensor format

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.