• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7III / a7III EDR vs shutter drive mode

a7III EDR vs shutter drive mode

May 20, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Sony a7III.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7III”.

In the a7 and a7II, shutter drive mode affected the precision of the raw files and the read noise, and thus the Engineering Dynamic Range (EDR). I am pleased to report that the a7III has made significant progress here, and you don’t have to worry nearly as much about shutter drive mode.

In the single shot (SS) mode, you have three choices for shutter operation: all-mechanical (MS), electronic first-curtain shutter (EFCS), and silent shutter, which I’m calling ES so as not to get it confused with single shot. Here is the EDR for single shot operation for all three shutter modes.

The electronic shutter doesn’t allow the use of ISO settings 50, 64, and 80, so they aren’t plotted above. Looks like I didn’t plot ISO 100 for the ES mode, either; oops. I haven’t included a legend since the curves are all on top of each other.  The ISOs below 100 provide no increase in EDR over those above 100, and in some cases afford less EDR. I recommend staying away from these “fake ISOs”.

In continuous low (CL) shutter drive mode:

There is no difference. That’s wonderful.

Now let’s look at the improvement in EDR over what would be the case if the camera were ISOless. I’ll drop the ISOs below 100 for this. The graphs are normalized so that base ISO is 0 stops improvement.

First in single shot mode:

If the camera were ISOless, we’d see a flat line at 0. Positive values indicate that the camera offers better performance than an ISOless camera. You can see that the camera is nearly ISOless from ISO 250 to 500, and from 640 on up.

The same is true in CL mode:

All the above plots were made with uncompressed raw turned on. In many Sony alpha 7 cameras, raw compression exacts no EDR penalty. But the analog to digital converter (ADC) in the a7III appears to be better than before. Let’s compare compressed and uncompressed raw in single shot mode with the mechanical shutter:

You can see that, at base ISO, compression costs up about a tenth of a stop of EDR. That’s not enough to worry about.

a7III

← A promising idea, a disappointing outcome Sony a7III EDR in continuous bracketing mode →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.