• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / a7RII star-eating histograms

a7RII star-eating histograms

November 22, 2017 JimK 4 Comments

This is the fifth in a series of posts on the Sony a7RIII (and a7RII, for comparison) spatial processing that is invoked when you use a shutter speed of longer than 3.2 seconds. The series starts here.

I have been showing the effect of the Sony a7RIII’s, and, for comparison, the a7RII’s hot-pixel suppression algorithm (aka star-eater) by looking at the effect on dark-field noise in the frequency domain.  While I think this is an elegant approach, it is not very direct, since we are looking at a side effect of the algorithm, rather than its intended result. If we look at histograms, we can see some outliers directly. Unfortunately, we will also see the effects of fixed-pattern read noise, which is exiled to the far left of the graph in the frequency domain. 

What the hey, let’s give it a try.

This the full-frame histogram of a dark field at ISO 1000 and 3.2 seconds, with the a7RIII. The vertical scale is logarithmic; otherwise, the outliers would be down in the weeds.

Now let’s see what happens when we go to 4 seconds for the exposure:

Wow! The histogram sure narrows up.

Now we’ll do the same thing for the a7RII with release 3.0 firmware.

3.2 seconds:

 

4 seconds:

This looks very similar to the a7RIII plots, and I’m taking that as confirming evidence of the similarity of the a7RIII and a7RII star appetite.

Thanks to Rishi Sanyal for the files, and to the folks at RawDigger, for writing such a great tool.

[Added an hour or so later]

If we export the red raw channel from RawDigger, bring it into Matlab, pass a 25×25 pixel highpass filter kernel over it to get rid of a lot of the FPRN, the asymmetrical nature of the star-eater algorithm is more apparent. The plots are in the same order as above. Note the horizontal axis scaling changes between graphs. I should probably fix that if I’m going to be doing a lot of this.

 

 

 

a7RIII

← Star-eating test methods a7RIII star-eater green channel histograms →

Comments

  1. David Braddon-Mitchell says

    November 22, 2017 at 1:48 pm

    Jim did you do any of these measurements from files taken with LENR turned ON?
    It occurs to me that since LENR is dark frame subtraction, Sony might not feel the need for spatial filtering as well…

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 22, 2017 at 1:54 pm

      I did. There’s not much difference.

      Reply
  2. Andrew Clifton says

    November 28, 2017 at 12:13 am

    Jim, I’d really like to know if the star-eater issue has been observed in the Sony A99ii. I have three A-mount Samyang lenses, which are great for astrophotography – and amazing as the A7Riii surely is, the A99ii is also a great camera… and I have a good collection of Minolta and Sony A-mount glass to use with it. Have you tested the A99ii – or do you know if any other astrophotographer has done so, for this issue?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 28, 2017 at 7:38 am

      I have no information on the a99II, not have I tested one. Srry.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.