• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIII / Comparing a7RIII and D850 shadow noise vs ISO setting

Comparing a7RIII and D850 shadow noise vs ISO setting

July 26, 2018 JimK 1 Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Sony a7RIII. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7RIII”. This post is equally about the Nikon D850. You can get to the other posts about that camera in the same way; just look for “D850”.

I’ve now analyzed the way that noise varies with exposure and ISO setting in the D850 and the a7RIII, and found the two cameras to behave remarkably similarly. In this post, I’ll quantify those similarities.

Here’s the improvement in SNR that is created by turning up the ISO as opposed to leaving it at base ISO, with the horizontal axis normalized to the base ISO of each camera. For those of you who haven’t read the quantitative posts about the a7RIII and the D850, each point on the curves below represent the improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio that would result from advancing the ISO knob from base ISO instead of just leaving it as base ISO and pushing in postproduction. The SNR improvement has been converted to stops, which is something with which most photographers are comfortable. I’ve done plots for 5 different places on the camera’s tone curve. Here they are from the lightest to the darkest.

 

 

 

 

The conversion gain change that takes place in both cameras as the ISO knob is turned from 2 1/3 stops above base ISO to  2 2/3 stops above base ISO is mainly what’s keeping the cameras from being ISOless. What if we plot the SNR improvement in the same way, but reset the standard for pushing in postproduction to the ISO 2 2/3 stops above base ISO for that ISO setting and all those above it?

 

 

 

 

Now you can see that the a7RIII is just a hair more ISOless than the D850, but not to the degree that would warrant a different exposure strategy.

The numbers show the same thing as our visual tests. Once we’ve accounted for the different base ISOs, these two cameras are similarly ISO-insensitive, and where the behavior departs from ISOless, it does so in the same way.

 

a7RIII, D850

← a7RIII exposure strategy — auto-exposure settings Comparing a7RIII, D850, and D5 sensitivity →

Trackbacks

  1. Comparing a7RIII, D850 and D5 sensitivity says:
    July 29, 2018 at 1:34 pm

    […] the last post, I compared the shadow noise performance of the Nikon D850 and Sony a7RIII. I did so looking at the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.