• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a9 / Sony a9 write speed

Sony a9 write speed

June 13, 2017 JimK 7 Comments

This is the 24th in a series of posts on the Sony a9. The series starts here.

When it comes to SD cards for the a9, there are two kinds of fast:

On the right, a card that used to be the state of the art when it came to SD card speed. It’s rated at 150 MB/s. If the a9’s 6 GB buffer emptied at that speed, it would take about 40 seconds to empty it. In fact, it takes more than twice that long. I figured that the camera was the limiting factor, not the card, so using a faster card wouldn’t make much difference.

I figured wrong.

Using Sony’s new speed demon, which at rated speed could empty the buffer in 20 seconds, gets you a rate that is a bit less than half that, and twice as fast as the Lexar card. Color me impressed.

By the way, with the Sony card it only takes 33 seconds to clear the buffer with uncompressed files. Probably the reason it’s shorter with uncompressed files is that, since there are fewer files, there is less file system overhead.

Experimental protocol:

  • Compressed raw
  • Full size files
  • ES enabled
  • Continuous high drive mode
  • 1/8000 second
  • MF lens
  • FW version 1.00
  • ISO 2500
  • Recording mode: Standard
  • Freshly formatted SD card
  • Hold down the shutter release until the buffer fills
  • Take your finger off the release
  • Time how long it takes before the red light goes out. 

a9

← Sony a7RII FW 4.0 star-eating Sony a9 write speed & battery draw →

Comments

  1. Maciej Mazur says

    June 13, 2017 at 8:17 pm

    Hi Jim,

    If possible can you do a quick test on the A7Rii with the Sony card to see if there is any benefit? Thanks.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 13, 2017 at 8:38 pm

      There is none.

      Reply
  2. Michael E. Sullivan says

    June 14, 2017 at 6:38 am

    Thanks for doing this. But the Lexar equivalent to the new Sony card would be the Lexar 2000X. I wonder how different results from that would be from the new Sony. I suspect they would be very close.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 14, 2017 at 7:59 am

      Thanks. I’ll check that out. I wasn’t suggesting that the Lexar card I used was equivalent. I just happened to be using it before the Sony arriveed, and it was the fastest thing I had lying around.

      Reply
  3. Ivan Chirkov says

    July 19, 2017 at 1:45 am

    Hi!

    There is a site that makes tests of lots of memory cards and cameras. They’ve tested Sony A9 and actually “Lexar Professional 2000x UHS-II 64GB” is by a tiny bit faster then the Sony SF-G.

    Reply
  4. Ivan Chirkov says

    July 19, 2017 at 1:45 am

    Here is the link for Sony A9 review: https://www.cameramemoryspeed.com/sony-a9/fastest-sd-cards-uhs-i-vs-uhs-ii/

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony Tidbits... - sonyalpharumors sonyalpharumors says:
    July 2, 2017 at 10:03 pm

    […] BHphoto, eBay, Amazon.de, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.fr, Amazon.it, Amazon.es. Sony a9 write speed (Jim Kasson) Here’s How One Photographer Keeps His Sony Camera Cool (PetaPixel). To Connect with my Subjects, […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.