• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / Fujifilm GFX 100 II EDR with and without LENR

Fujifilm GFX 100 II EDR with and without LENR

October 3, 2023 JimK 2 Comments

This is the thirteenth post in a series of tests of the Fujifilm GFX 100, Mark II. You can find all the posts in this series by going to the Categories pane in the right hand panel and clicking on “GFX 100 II”.

Long Exposure Noise Reduction (LENR) is an optional feature of the GFX 100 II, and of most serious digital cameras. It is not particularly well understood by many photographers, so I’ll explain how it works.

When LENR is active, the camera makes a second exposure with the shutter closed, and subtracts that image from the first, normal, exposure. The purpose of this is to get rid of hot pixels that are the result of the camera’s integrating dark current over a long period. This ends up suppressing noise that is frame-to-frame invariant (like hot pixels), but, unfortunately, increasing the noise that is independent from frame to frame by about 40%. So you don’t want to invoke LENR unless you need it.

Most cameras, including the GFX 100 II, don’t use LENR except for long exposure durations, even when it it turned on in the menu system. The GFX 100 II won’t use LENR for exposures shorter than 8 seconds, which is a fairly high threshold as these things go.

I tested the GFX 100 II at ISO 1000 with the body cap on at all the manually settable shutter speeds between 1/4000 seconds and 60 seconds. With LENR on, I used 16 bit precision, and with LENR off, I used 14 bits. The purpose of the different precision settings is to see whether 16-bit precision helps things for the shutter speeds below 8 seconds, where LENR is not operating. If you glance a the graph below, you can see that there is no material difference.

 

Log base 2 scales for both axes, with stops of EDR on the y-axis, and shutter speed duration on the x-axis. LENR helps a bit where it’s used, at the shutter speeds of 8 seconds and longer. The larger benefit of LENR is not visible in this graph, since a few hot pixels don’t make a big difference in the average noise signal. The biggest drawback of LENR is that you can’t use the camera during the second exposure.

GFX 100 II

← Fujifilm GFX 100 II — preparing for photon transfer curve testing Fujifilm GFX 100 II — FWC, input referred RN, photon transfer curves →

Comments

  1. Adam P says

    October 4, 2023 at 2:44 am

    Will there be a post about the effect of offset microlenses regarding adapted lenses? Thanks.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 4, 2023 at 4:47 am

      I’m trying to think of a good way to do that. I’ve gotten rid of just about all of my short symmetric lenses.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.