• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / A visual look at GFX 100 focus bracketing step sizes

A visual look at GFX 100 focus bracketing step sizes

August 8, 2019 JimK 6 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100”.

I did a quantitative analysis of the Fuji GFX 50S focus bracketing step sizes, and reported the results in terms of displacement of the plane of focus on the sensor in micrometers (um) and in the size of the implied circle of confusion (CoC), also in um. That scores well for precision, and for those of you willing to dust off the lensmaker’s equation and figure out what that means in terms of the object-field focal plane, was all you needed. But a lot of people are more visually than mathematically inclined, and I had nothing for them, in spite of the fact that the GFX cameras do all the hard work to compensate for lens focal length, f-stop, and subject distance to keep the amount of focus-induced blur constant as you change all those things.

After I created the images for the previous post, I realized that I had the material I need to provide a visual cheat sheet for those desiring an aid to picking the step size. I created ten images of a Siemens Star target using a step size of 1. So image #2 is one step away from the starting point if you pick a step size of 2, image #3 is one step away from the starting point if you pick a step size of 3, image #4 is one step away from the starting point if you pick a step size of 4, and so forth.

Here’s the series. Tips on how to use it are below the images.

0, or in focus

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 

8

 

9

Say you’re doing focus bracketing. Decide how far out of focus is acceptable by picking a just-marginal image. set the step size to double that (assuming that the most out-of-focus area in a stack is half way in between the steps) or one unit less. If you’re doing stacking, decide how much softness the stacking program can manage, and pick that step size.

Enjoy!

GFX 100

← Sensors outresolving lenses How fast is the GFX 100 electronic shutter? →

Comments

  1. Rico Pfirstinger says

    August 9, 2019 at 2:00 am

    Step 4 appears to missing, at least in my browser (Safari Mac)

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 9, 2019 at 6:36 am

      Thanks. Fixed now.

      Reply
  2. BT Hathaway says

    August 9, 2019 at 3:38 am

    I’m in no way an optical engineer, which means I have absolutely no way to tackle the math you speak of; but neither does focus bracketing on a two dimensional target help me visualize my shot, when I’m trying to figure out (at any given focal length and aperture) approximately how many steps of a certain size will move me all the way through the scene in front of me—whether that’s a product shot on a table, or a room for an interiors shot or the Grand Canon.

    It would not surprise me if i’m oversimplifying the problem, but I’ve been thinking in terms of setting up my camera at a long railing or fence running perpendicular to the sensor and beginning to build a chart of step distances covered for any given lens and it’s settings. Brute force obviously, but for those of us who went to music school or art school rather than having an engineering degree, perhaps that will be a more visual and concrete approach.

    If for instance I set up the 110mm in a space 20 ft deep at f5.6, how many steps and of what size will it take to make sure I have sharp focus from the minimum focus distance, to the far wall? Right now I’m just guessing and with a little trial and error I get by, but it seems like there should be a fairly reliable heuristic way for me to pre-visualize the movement of the focal plane through the 3D space I see in front of me, so I can work more quickly and consistently. There’s probably an app for this, but to be honest I’m tired of pulling my phone out every five minutes. I would much rather have a method I can work out in my head as I assess the shot.

    I’m very new to focus stacking, so I welcome any help I can get.

    Thank you.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 9, 2019 at 6:30 am

      I think you’re trying to get more of that post than what I intended it to show. I merely offer it as a guide to picking the step size based on your tolerance for misfocusing. Figuring out the number of steps is beyond the scope of the post. If you want to do it with no math at all, pick the step size using the pictures in the post above, pick a huge number of steps, focus on the near, trigger the sequence, look at the pictures on the LCD as they are captured, and stop the sequence when you can see that the camera has gone too far.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Quantifying the Fuji GFX 100 focus bracket step size says:
    August 10, 2019 at 12:54 pm

    […] this post, I gave you a visual look at the focus bracketing step size, and I’ll be mor quantitative […]

    Reply
  2. A visual look at GFX 100 diffraction blur says:
    August 11, 2019 at 10:55 am

    […] this post, I showed images of a Siemens Star as the GFX 100 stepped through a series of what we know from the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.