the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Sensors outresolving lenses

Sensors outresolving lenses

August 8, 2019 By JimK 4 Comments

A DPR poster posed an interesting question: “What does sensor outresolving look like in photos?” In order to deal with this, I needed to define what “sensor outresolving” means. I’m taking it to mean that the sensor samples the projected image from the lens not just at, but more finely than the Nyquist frequency.

If that’s the right definition, I ran a little experiment to determine the answer. I set up the GFX 100 and the Fuji 110 mm f/2 lens on this scene:

I used the focus bracketing feature of the GFX 100 to step through and well past the in-focus point, using the smallest possible step size of 1. I developed the images in Lightroom with a few contrast, white balance, and exposure tweaks, and I set the sharpening to strength = 20, radius = 1, and detail = 0.

Here’s an in-focus crop:

I then scanned the images until I found the closest one in the sequence that had no visible aliasing. It was 18 steps away from the in-focus one.

There’s your answer. If you’re going to use diffraction, lens aberrations, and defocusing to create a strong enough low-pass filter that there’s no visible aliasing, your image is going to look really soft at the pixel level.

← Fujifilm GFX 50R and 100 shadow noise with nonlinear noise reduction A visual look at GFX 100 focus bracketing step sizes →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    August 9, 2019 at 5:21 am

    Even that out-of-focus one shows some phase reversal.

    Reply
  2. Federico says

    January 13, 2020 at 10:37 pm

    Jim, is there a mode, or could there be, then, of a camera, that takes two shots, and that some algorithm could maybe not perfectly, but rather successfully detect false colors? Today, I rely sometimes on RawTherapee False Color Suppression, which just tries to guess.

    Another question that came to mind is how would this look like for a Pixel Shifted Image (4 images full color information).

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 14, 2020 at 8:30 am

      Jim, is there a mode, or could there be, then, of a camera, that takes two shots, and that some algorithm could maybe not perfectly, but rather successfully detect false colors?

      You can do that in post, after a fashion. Use auto-align on the two shots, then subtract them.

      Reply
    • JimK says

      January 14, 2020 at 8:32 am

      Another question that came to mind is how would this look like for a Pixel Shifted Image (4 images full color information).

      https://blog.kasson.com/gfx-100/sony-a7riv-with-pixel-shift-vs-fujifilm-gfx-100/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

April 2021
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Pixel shift with the Fujifilm GFX 100S
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • JimK on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • John Leathwick on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • Christer Almqvist on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • JimK on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • Tom Hegeman on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • Bjoern on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • JimK on Shutter shock in the GFX 100s

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.