• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100S / Smallrig GFX 100S L-bracket

Smallrig GFX 100S L-bracket

April 7, 2021 JimK 10 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100S. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100S”.

RRS isn’t even estimating delivery dates for their GFX plates and L-brackets, and Smallrig is already delivering. In the past, there have been issues with some of their brackets, but this is a really nice piece of kit. Finish is good. It fits well, and the ergonomics are mostly good.

Here’s a bottom view, with some items of interest marked.

The red arrow points to the 1/4-20 screw that attaches the bracket to the camera. As shipped, this was a flat-head screw fitting, like the one pointed to by the white arrow. I don’t like those a lot, so I replaced it with an Allen-head screw. The bracket does come with a rudimentary screwdriver for flathead screws. The green arrow points to that. The yellow arrow identifies a strap slot.

Here’s something that I really like. The blue arrow points to a legend that says what camera the bracket fits. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve wished for this while sorting through a bin full of brackets trying to find the one for a particular camera.

There is adequate clearance to open the battery door.

From the left side:

 

You can’t open either door, because of lack of clearance at the places the yellow arrows identify. However, you can slide the left side of the bracket out far enough to allow access to the stuff behind theses doors. The white arrow in the top image shows the screw you need to loosen to do that.

Here’s a view from the right:

 

The bracket provides a useful place to put your little finger, improving the grip.

Viewed from the back, the bracket provides both portrait and landscape orientation center line markings, and they appear to be accurate.

In the past, the Smallrig brackets have not used the RRS dovetail spec, making the use of RRS cam-clamps dangerous. This bracket fits perfectly in those clamps.

GFX 100S

← The degradation of detents Fujifilm GF lenses hotspotting at 720 nm →

Comments

  1. David Berryrieser says

    April 7, 2021 at 5:16 pm

    I have wondered about the stability of L-brackets where the ‘L’ portion is bolted on. RRS & Kirk have avoided this approach, and a solid piece of aluminum is undoubtedly stronger, but I don’t know if its enough to make a practical difference. If I get motivated at some point I will try and build a rig to test it.

    Reply
  2. Pieter Kers says

    April 8, 2021 at 1:56 am

    Really need the lines that shows the centres of the lens, as RSS does that always perfect.
    Does it have one?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      April 8, 2021 at 6:00 am

      It has two.

      Reply
  3. Rico Pfirstinger says

    April 12, 2021 at 12:10 am

    I switched to SmallRig for my Fuji cameras some time ago, and I’m quite happy with my L brackets and plates for the X-T4, X-S10, GFX100 and GFX100S.

    Reply
  4. Christopher Hauser says

    April 13, 2021 at 12:59 am

    It’s interesting that for you it works with your small finger. I find it a horrible design. Super uncomfortable to hold, as my small finger won’t fit aboth the smallrig and the smallrig numb goes inward and feels pretty bad.

    Inwould wish they just extended the grip instead of changing it.

    Reply
    • Tim Parish says

      May 3, 2021 at 1:53 am

      A direct extension of the grip would have fouled the battery compartment door, making the grip as useless as the Fujifilm one! That small extension allows the battery door to open fully.

      Reply
  5. SteveG says

    May 3, 2021 at 5:29 am

    I too have the Smallrig on my 100S. It works very well and contrary to Christopher Hauser, my hand fits the grip/bracket interface very well. The extending L-bracket part has a very small dovetail profile, I think, that locks in the two parts of the bracket when the “white” screw is tightened. It’s not too tight a fit, though, that when the screw is once again released that it restricts the release/sliding mechanism. I don’t anticipate considering any other bracket for my 100S now.
    (Mr Hauser doesn’t work for RRS, does he? 😉 )

    Reply
  6. Joseph Holmes says

    July 24, 2021 at 7:47 pm

    Jim,

    I got one of the L-plates from Rogeti for my 100S about a week ago. After making a bunch of quickie snapshots of it upon arrival I thought I should just go ahead and post an article about it, so I did:

    https://www.josephholmes.com/news/2021/7/19/a-successful-l-plate-solution-for-the-gfx-100s

    Upshot is that I like it.

    Joe

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 25, 2021 at 8:33 am

      Thanks for that, Joe.

      Reply
  7. Rich says

    September 18, 2022 at 12:18 pm

    Anyone have recommendations for a cable clamp that works well with this bracket?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.