• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Fuji 35-70 GF transfocal bokeh

Fuji 35-70 GF transfocal bokeh

January 10, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

There are two important aspects to bokeh. It seems most people, when they hear the word, think immediately of the look of parts of the scene that are for out of focus. That’s a good thing to think about when buying, selecting, or using a lens, but the, ahem, focus, of today’s post is going to be on another aspect of bokeh: the characteristics of the lens in reddering subjects that are nearly in focus. The way the lens handles the change from sharply in focus to definitely out of focus is important in the look that the camera and lens give to three-dimensional subjects closer than landscape distances.

The MTF Mapper returns information about the line spread function (LSF), which can be thought of as the radial component of the point spread function (PSF).* The PSF defines the image-forming behavior of the lens. Looking at the PSF yields the same information as looking at the modulation transfer function; the difference is that the PSF is in the space domain, and the MTF is in the frequency domain (thanks to Joseph Fourier, 1768-1830). Sometimes the frequency domain is the way to look at things. Other times, you’re better off staying in the space domain. Trying to assess the rendering qualities of a lens in the space domain seems to work better. For one, it’s pretty easy to do it in a way that allows you to visualize the color effects. For another, do to looking at out of focus distant spectral highlights, we are more or less used to looking at PSFs.

The below image was made at 35mm and f/4.5, using a radial edge near the right side of the image. The vertical direction is the shift of the focal plane with respect to the plane of the sensor. Focus distance runs from top to bottom, with front-focused at the top and back-focused at the bottom. The horizontal axis a heavily-magnified view of distance in the sensor plane in the tangential direction, perpendicular to the edge. The colors are highly approximate; I just assigned the raw channels to their respective sRGB channels.

 

The reddish tint at the top of the image and the blueish tint at the bottom is an indication of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). Front-focused objects will be reddish with blue halos.

Now let’s look at the same position, but with a tangential edge, with the horizontal axis radially oriented:

The part of blue banding on the left  that is more or less constant is an indication of lateral chromatic aberration (LaCA). The red and green banding on the right is an indication of LoCA that is more prevalent when the lens is back-focused.

If we look in the center of an image made with the same lens at the same focal length, we see something closer to the ideal.

35-70 at 35mm on axis. f/4.5

There’s still some LoCA, but, as you’d expect, no LaCA. The center of the blur circle is a different color than the periphery.

Stopping the lens down two-thirds of a stop helps off axis.

35-70 at 35mm on axis. f/5.6

 

35-70 at 35mm right edge radial edge /5.6

 

35-70 at 35mm right edge tangential edge /5.6

 

Here’s what happens at f/8:

35-70 at 35mm on axis f/8

 

35-70 at 35mm right edge radial edge f/8

 

35-70 at 35mm right edge tangential edge f/8

Turning to results with the lens at 45mm.

35-70 at 45mm, center, f/5.6

Blue rings on front-focus objects, and red ones on back-focused objects.

35-70 at 45mm, right edge, tangential edge, f/5.6

This is similar behavior to what we saw at 35mm, but it’s less pronounced.

35-70 at 45mm, right edge, radial edge, f/5.6

As before, the performance with a radial edge is closer to ideal.

Let’s look at the most problematic of the above cases at f/8.

35-70 at 45mm, right edge, tangential edge, f/8

It is much better behaved.

Now at 70 mm.

35-70 at 70mm, center, f/5.6

LoCA is way down.

35-70 at 70mm, right edge, tangential edge, f/5.6

LaCA is down, too.

35-70 at 45mm, right edge, radial edge, f/5.6

Radial edges look pretty good.

 

 

 

 

GFX 100, GFX 100S, GFX 50S

← Picking a macro lens Nikon D5 and Z7 shadow noise under extreme conditions →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.