• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / AF-S and AF-C accuracy — 24-70/4 Nikkor S on Z7 at 35 mm

AF-S and AF-C accuracy — 24-70/4 Nikkor S on Z7 at 35 mm

October 6, 2018 JimK 5 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”.

One of the things that has troubled DSLR users since phase-detection autofocus (PDAF) was invented is erroneous and inconsistent results. Mirrorless cameras (MILCs) have been better at that, because they have more bows in their quivers. They can focus on the sensor itself, bypassing the alignment and shimming that besets finder-PDAF in DLSRs. They can perform trimming operations using contrast-detect autofocus (CDAF). If your subject is holding still, it’s just a more accurate system. But, for the most part, it’s been a slower one, so accuracy can suffer in dynamic situations.

I’m not going to talk about speed today; just accuracy.

When I was testing the D850, I developed an autofocus accuracy test the involved making photographs of a checkerboard ramp and analyzing them with a computer program that I wrote in Matlab. Here’s what the setup looks like:

I mounted the 24-70 mm f/4 Nikkor S on the Z7 and set the focal length to 35 mm. I set up 1 meter from the target, and measured the focus shift of the lens as I stopped it down from f/4 to f/11 in 1/3 stop steps.

There are 10 measurements per tested aperture. They are plotted as dots. I measure the focus location in each of the Adobe RGB color planes, and which plane the measurement came from is indicated by the color of the dots. I’ve plotted the mean, mean-plus-standard-deviation, and mean-minus-standard-deviation values as lines. The amount of scattering in the dots and the distance between the mean-plus-standard-deviation and mean-minus-standard-deviation gives you an idea of the experimental error. The vertical axis is focus error at the image sensor in micrometers, with positive numbers indicating back-focus.

To get a better idea of how this will influence photography, consider the circles-of-confusion (CoCs) on the sensor implied by that much focus error:

 

The sensor pitch on the Z7 is about 4 and a half micrometers (um), so the worst error is well under the sensor pitch. This is very low focus shift. Note also the fact that all three color planes are brought into focus at essentially the same plane. That means the lens has very low longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). For a relatively inexpensive zoom lens, this is spectacular performance. A word about the negative numbers on the CoC graph: of course, the circle of confusion can’t ever really be negative, but I am using negative numbers to represent front-focusing.

Now let’s look at how well the camera does with automatic focusing using AF-S and user-controlled spot selection.

Again, the CoC graph is more instructive.

The worst errors are on the order of the sensor pitch. This is excellent performance.

 

And the CoCs:

Again, the accuracy is excellent. And this is with no focus-trimming.

For comparison, here is the Fuji 63 mm f/2.8 on the GFX 50S:

 

The Sigma 50 mm f/1.4 ART after focus tuning:

 

The Zony 55 on the a7RIII:

And the 58 mm f/1.4 Nikkor on the D850:

 

Nikon Z6/7

← Z7 magnified LCD lag AF-S and AFC accuracy — 24-70/4 Nikkor S on Z7 at 70 mm →

Comments

  1. Jakob says

    October 7, 2018 at 12:46 pm

    Hi, good content as always but you wrote 24 – 35 mm f/4 Nikkor S when you meant the 24 – 70 Lens at the beginning. You can delete this comment.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 7, 2018 at 12:52 pm

      I’m going to leave your comment in as a reminder to readers to correct me when they see things wrong. Thanks. Fixed.

      Reply
  2. SrMi says

    October 7, 2018 at 1:27 pm

    This post is located in “Home / GFX 50 S /” instead of in “Home / Nikon Z6/7 /”.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 7, 2018 at 1:32 pm

      Thanks. Fixed.

      Reply
  3. Edward Wrobel says

    October 10, 2018 at 6:01 am

    Thank you Jim,

    I just ordered Z7 with 24-70.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.