• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Nikon D5 and Z7 shadow noise under extreme conditions

Nikon D5 and Z7 shadow noise under extreme conditions

January 10, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

If you look at Bill Claff’s photographic dynamic range numbers, the D5 does better than the Z7 at extreme nosebleed ISO settings. There are some folks saying that’s not the case in the real world.

I called my bookcase into service:

Test protocol:

  • RRS legs, C1 head
  • Sigma 35/1.4 Art lens, directly attached to D5 and attached to Z7 with FTZ
  • ETTR exposure f/4 at 1/40 second at ISO 12800 set manually
  • ETTR exposure and ETTR – x stops, with x running from 1 to 5
  • AF-S
  • Developed in LrC, current version
  • Default settings except for the following
  • Exposure compensation to correct underexposed images to ETTR brightness
  • Sharpening turned off
  • Noise reduction turned off

Here are some crops with the same field of view. The Z7 crop is magnified to about 200%.

D5, ISO 12800, ETTR

 

Z7, ISO 12800, ETTR

In the dim light, the Z7 couldn’t focus as well. Strangely, the Z7 got better at focusing as the exposure fell. Just look at the smooth areas to interpret the noise.

D5, ISO 12800, ETTR-1

 

Z7, ISO 12800, ETTR -1

 

D5, ISO 12800, ETTR-2

 

Z7, ISO 12800, ETTR-2

 

D5, ISO 12800, ETTR-3

 

Z7, ISO 12800, ETTR-3

 

D5, ISO 12800, ETTR-4

 

Z7, ISO 12800, ETTR-4

 

D5, ISO 12800, ETTR-5

 

Z7, ISO 12800, ETTR-5

The noise pattern is finer with the Z7, so if you back up further you should see less noise, but I think this simple test reinforces Bill Claff’s results.

But what if you turn on noise reduction? Stay tuned.

Nikon Z6/7

← Fuji 35-70 GF transfocal bokeh Nikon D5 and Z7 shadow noise under extreme conditions, repeated →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.