• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Z7 with 105/1.4 focus shift, pinpoint and single AF accuracy

Z7 with 105/1.4 focus shift, pinpoint and single AF accuracy

November 10, 2018 JimK Leave a Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”.

For my next step in peeling layers off the onion that is the Nikon Z7 autofocus system, I’m doing aperture series (f/1.4 through f/5.6) with the Nikon 105 mm f/1.4 lens attached via the Nikon FTZ adapter. Here’s the set-up:

The camera is now on a camera stand since I now realize that I have to rack focus between each shot, and I’m scared that I’ll jostle the camera if I try to do that while it’s on a tripod. The intervalometer is attached and is resting on top of the tripod/head assembly on the left. The checkerboard ramp is visible in the center of the image, 2.5 meters from the camera.

The first thing I did is look at the focus shift for the lens. I focused once, wide open, then made 16 exposures at one-third aperture intervals all the way through f/5.6. I processed the data in my Matlab program, and this is what it spit out:

Plotted above as dots above are the image field (sensor plane) focussed distances for all the samples for each of the Adobe RGB color planes. The difference between the three color planes is a measure of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA). The distances are measured from the average of the green plane samples with the lens wide open. Backfocusing is indicated by positive numbers and front focus by negative ones. The heavy lines are the average of all 16 samples at each aperture, and the lighter ones are plus and minus one standard deviation away from that.

It’s pretty obvious that the lens has considerable LoCA, with the red plane at f/1.4 focusing about 10 micrometers behind the green one.

To see the effect on photographs, it’s better to look at the diameters of the circles of confusion (CoCs) implied by the above displacements of the image plane.

Total focus-shift-induced blur circle diameter is about two pixel pitches.

Now let’s try it with autofocus, in AF-S and Pinpoint modes, which gets us CDAF.

The autofocus system compensates for the focus shift. That’s because the camera focuses at taking aperture for that range of f-stops.

Let’s look at the effect of that on image misfocus blur:

That is an excellent performance.

Now we’ll look at AF-S in Single mode, which uses PDAF, possibly in conjunction with CDAF. For these captures, I racked focus alternately forward and backward between the shots.

The focus shift appears to be compensated, but there appears to be a small amount of back-focusing.

In terms of blur circles:

That is again good performance, but with greater scatter than Pinpoint mode.

 

Nikon Z6/7

← Z7/FTZ AF fine-tuning Z7 w/ 105/1.4 static focus errors in various AF modes, revisited →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.