• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Home

Comparing downsampling algorithms — ISO 12233

September 25, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

For the next few posts, I’ll be showing images that have been downsampled using several different algorithms Photoshop’s bilinear interpolation Ps bicubic sharper Lightroom export with no sharpening Lr export with Low, Standard, and High sharpening for glossy paper A complicated filter based on Elliptical Weighted Averaging (EWA), performed at two gammas and blended at… [Read More]

The Last Word

Lightroom downsizing: export sharpening noise effects

September 24, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Yesterday I reported on the amount of noise, and the spectra, of noisy test images exported from Lightroom with sharpening turned off. Today we’ll see what happens when it’s set. Here’s the test protocol. The target image is a 4000×4000 sRGB, with each plane filled with a constant signal of half-scale, (0.5, 127.5, or 32767.5,… [Read More]

The Last Word

Noise effects in Lightroom downsized exporting

September 23, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

In the last two posts, I delved into how well Photoshop (Ps) does in minimizing photon noise when downsizing images using bilinear and bicubic sharper interpolation. Today I’m turning my attention to Lightroom (Lr). With Lr, you don’t get to choose your resampling algorithm or the gamma of the space in which Lr does the… [Read More]

The Last Word

Noise effects of Photoshop Bicubic Sharper downsizing

September 23, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

Same test image as yesterday 4000×4000 monochromatic, 16-bit gray gamma 2.2, filled with a constant signal of half-scale, (0.5, 127.5, or 32767.5, depending on how you think of it), with Gaussian noise with standard deviation of 1/10 scale added to it. The image was created in Matlab, written out as a 16-bit TIFF, read into… [Read More]

The Last Word

Noise effects of Photoshop bilinear interpolation downsizing

September 22, 2014 JimK 2 Comments

When I last left you, the jury was out on the issue of whether the bilinear interpolation downsizing algorithm in Photoshop was the same as the one in Matlab. The jury is back. “Mr. Foreman, have the jury reached a verdict?” “We have, your honor.” “May I hear it?” “The algorithms are wildly different, as… [Read More]

The Last Word

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 394
  • 395
  • 396
  • 397
  • 398
  • …
  • 577
  • Next Page »
May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.