• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RII / Sony a7RII long exposure battery current draw

Sony a7RII long exposure battery current draw

December 20, 2017 JimK 2 Comments

I’ve been made aware of an objection to the Sony a7RII star-eater workaround that I documented in this post. A poster on Fred Miranda claimed that using continuous mode would result in greater sensor heating (and therefore more read noise) than using single shot mode. That didn’t seem right to me, but things that seemed nearly self-evident have turned out not to be so simple when I started testing, and I thought that could possibly be the case here.

It’s not.

Here is an oscilloscope trace of an a7RII’s battery current versus time when making a 4-second single shot EFCS exposure at ISO 640 in uncompressed raw mode:

No lens was used, just a body cap. The time base is set to 1 second per division. The vertical axis is about 130 milliamps per division. Just after the third division starts, the shutter is tripped. You can see the scanning of the sensor stop then. Current drops for the first second of the exposure then increases slightly for the other three seconds. I’ve no idea why that happens. Then, at the end of the exposure, the current increases abruptly for about 200 milliseconds as the sensor is read, then the scanning resumes. 

Average current draw during the higher-current part of the exposure is 330 as measured by a digital milliammeter with 100 milliohms impedance. 

Now we’ll look at an exposure under the same conditions except that the shutter mode is continuous high:

The current draw is essentially the same. The milliammeter says that, too.

This time gut feel wins one.

a7RII, Star-Eater

← a7RIII star-eater questions answered D850 PDAF tuning and focus shift →

Comments

  1. Joe Holmes says

    December 22, 2017 at 2:30 pm

    Great work Jim 🙂 I have to wonder how you got your meter between the battery and the camera, LOL And thanks for finding this A7r II star-eater workaround. I can hardly believe that Sony hasn’t yet provided an off switch in the firmware.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 22, 2017 at 2:34 pm

      I have to wonder how you got your meter between the battery and the camera

      Here’s the set-up, Joe:

      http://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/refining-the-a7rii-battery-current-measurements/

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.