• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technical / Wag the dog part 7

Wag the dog part 7

July 11, 2011 JimK Leave a Comment

When I started putting Leica lenses on the Sony NEX-5, I assumed that just about any Leica lens was going to be a big step up from the Sony 16mm that comes with the camera (you can also get the camera with the 18-55 mm zoom). I was surprised to find image quality to be an approximate tossup between the 16mm Sony kit lens and the Tri-Elmar. The Leica 18 mm Super Elmar M acquits itself very well on the NEX-5. In fact that body, because of the antialiasing filter, is incapable of extracting all of the resolution that the lens can deliver.

Things are different when you’re comparing Leica lenses to the Sony 18-55 mm zoom. The Sony zoom is acceptable at 18mm, but things go downhill fast as you zoom in.  You’ll get far better results with almost any fixed-focal-length Leica lens, and you’ll have excellent manual focusing, a good depth of field scale, and focal lengths and lens speeds not available with the Sony lenses. The longer Leica lenses, so problematical on the M9 because of focusing and framing difficulties, work great on the NEX-5 if the subject is static.

At the end of my experiments, I have the following specific advice:

If you’ve got a pile of Leica lenses and want to use them on a digital body, but the M9 (or even a used M8) is too rich for your blood, using them on the NEX-5 makes a lot of sense, providing you can stand the brain-dead Sony ergonomics. You’ll get good images at a bargain price.

If you want to shoot video and manually focus, Leica lenses are an excellent solution. Leica lenses are famous for their silky smooth, perfectly weighted focusing. They are as good in this regard as the Sony lenses are bad. However, I don’t think I would go out and buy Leica lenses for this application; I’d probably get an adapter to a line of lenses that is not so outrageously expensive.

If you want a more pocketable backup to your M9, the NEX-5 will fill the bill. Remember the 1.5 X multiplier when selecting lenses.

If you’re working with relatively static subjects and are frustrated by the focusing accuracy you’re getting with your M9, using live view to focus the NEX-5 will be pure joy. If you routinely use lenses longer than 50 mm, run, do not walk, to your camera dealer and buy the Sony.

If you have an NEX-5, and don’t have the Sony 16mm lens, get one. It’s small, light, and remarkably good. While you’re at it, get the auxiliary finder; it’s not very accurate – showing a smaller area than you’ll see captured by the camera – but it works in bright light and allows steadier and more natural framing than holding the camera at arm’s length.

If you have no Leica lenses and are thinking of buying some to use on your NEX-5, save your money. Some of them are great, and all of them are at least pretty good, but the price/performance ratio is out of line. If you must upgrade your NEX-5 glass, consider instead the Zeiss or Voigtlander  M-series lenses.

 

Technical, The Last Word

← Wag the dog, part 6 Good enough →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.