• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Using the Epson 3880

Using the Epson 3880

November 27, 2009 JimK Leave a Comment

The 3880 came a couple of days ago. I went through the usual Epson shipping tape hunt, and found ’em all. Setup was simple using the USB port. After my Ethernet problems with the 3800, I figured I’d save the network connection for later.

In loading the ink cartridges into the printer, I had a very pleasant surprise. Except for the two magenta cartridges, the inks are the same as the 3800. I can use most of my old ink, saving me a few hundred bucks.

I had to print the paddles for the CPA auction, and I figured I’d made that my first test of the new printer. Based on the suggestion of another board member, I intended to use a Hewlett-Packard heavy matte paper (Q5445A). I opened the box, put a single sheet in the main hopper, and brought up the driver. It looked pretty much the same as the 3800 driver, so I felt right at home. I printed a nozzle test page. All nozzles present and working. I put another sheet in the hopper and printed the first paddle. It looked good. I put 25 sheets in the hopper, started the whole job. I watched the first page feed and went off to do something else. When I got back, the printer had stopped, there was a blank page on the top of the output pile, and the printer was complaining about a misfeed. It had only printed three pages. I removed the paper from the hopper, shuffled it, squared it up and tried again.  This time I only got two pages before the misfeed.

Abandoning the idea of testing the 3880, I put the matte paper in the front panel tray of a Xerox 6250 laser printer. It printed much faster, but misfed almost as often, even when I told it I was loading card stock (an option not available on the 3880). The person who recommended the paper to me has a 4800, and apparently his printer has no problem feeding it. My conclusion is that this paper is hard to feed (probably because it’s got enough tooth that the sheets don’t slide easily against each other), and that the fact that the 3880 can’t handle it is not a serious reflection on the printer.

I printed a run of 50 sheets on 20 pound bond with no problem. I printed a dozen 8x10s on Epson Premium Photo Paper Glossy (the paper formerly known as Premium Glossy Photo Paper; can anyone figure out why they felt they had to change the name?). The glossies printed with no problems.

Having put the main hopper through its paces, it was time to try out big paper with the rear feeder. I set the platen gap to “wide” and loaded up a 17×25 sheet of Harman Gloss FB Al. The printer took it. I printed a image, using the advanced B&W controls. It looked gorgeous. I queued up a color image, using the profile that came with the printer. I loaded another sheet of paper. I got the dreaded “paper skew error”. I tried again and again. After the fifth time, I gave up and turned the paper size check off with the printer front panel controls. Now I could load the paper. The print looked very good, but the colors weren’t quite perfect; I will have to make my own profiles, which is what I expected.

The Harman baryta-coated paper has some curl to it, much the same as baryta-coated fiber enlarging paper. I thought the curl might be giving the printer problems. To test this theory, I turned the paper size check back on and tried to load a few sheets of matte rag paper. No dice. Like with the 3800, the only practical way for me to use the rear paper feeder is to turn off paper size checking.

My conclusions are:

  • The 3880 is quite a capable printer. It is small. It is quiet. It can switch back and forth between photo and matte black without wasting a lot of ink. Print quality is very high.
  • The gamut is improved over the 3800 in the magenta direction.
  • There is less metamerism on B&W prints than with the 3800, and the 3800 wasn’t bad in this regard.
  • Except for the above, the print quality improvements over the 3800 are subtle.
  • It doesn’t handle paper any better than the 3800, which was not great in this department.
  • If you’re happy with your 3800, you should keep it.

The Bleeding Edge

← Experiences with an Epson 3800 The second Windows 7 upgrade →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.