the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Experiences with an Epson 3800

Experiences with an Epson 3800

November 26, 2009 JimK 2 Comments

Amazon shipped the Windows 7 Upgrade UPS ground instead of the 2nd day air I specified, so it won’t be here until next week. I will use the time to make friends with my new printer.

I’ve had an Epson 3800 for a couple of years now. I got it when the baryta-coated fiber papers began to be available. I’ve got a 9800 for matte papers. It’ll print on glossy paper as well, but you have to go through a 30-minute process of hovering over the printer flipping levers to change from matte black to photo black, all the while the printer runs through more than $50 worth of ink. Rather than do that, I thought I’d get a printer that could produce nearly the same results as the 9800, albeit on smaller paper, while having the ability to switch back and forth between the two kinds of black ink.

So I bought one of the first 3800s. I wasn’t disappointed in the print quality. It seemed to be every bit the equivalent of the 9800. However, there were other problems.

During the first few months, I was never able to print an entire 15×20 image on 17×22 paper. The printer always trailed off on the last half-inch or so. The folks at Epson professional support first said it was cockpit error, and then had me make a bunch of firmware changes, to no avail. They sent me a new printer. Same problem. They had me send them my files. They printed fine for them. Finally, they suggested not using the Ethernet port, but using the USB port instead. That fixed it. When they found that out, they said not to use the Ethernet port any more. After some complaining, that’s what I did. I figured that I didn’t have much choice. I asked them to let me know when they found the bug and fixed it, but I never heard from them.

In addition, the paper handling left a lot to be desired. The first problem I had was that it was way too persnickety when loading large sheets of paper. Loaded from the back or the front, it didn’t seem to make much difference. Three times out of four, it would reject the paper as being misaligned. I’d reload the paper, holding my tongue in a different position, and it would work. I never did learn how to do it right. I finally got fed up and turned off the alignment check.

The printer always fed just fine from the regular multi-sheet hopper, but sometimes when feeding from the rear slot it would get the paper hung up, not realize it, and print on nothing, dumping a whole page worth of ink in the bottom of the printer, where it would streak the next three or four prints. I suffered along.

When I printed the glossies for PhotoLucida last spring, I used the Harman baryta paper, which comes in 17×25 sheets. The 3800 is not specified to handle pieces of paper larger than 17×22, but the driver let me specify a custom size that worked just fine. I printed many 17x25s from the rear manual slot, with no problems except for the occasional lack of feeding the paper. I got pretty good at watching closely and stopping the printer before it made too much of a mess.

I fear that I may be giving the wrong impression of the 3800, because I’ve been focusing on the negatives. It is small. It is quiet. The nozzles hardly ever clog. The print quality is great. I have printed several thousand 8x10s from the standard hopper with hardly any problems. It is not a bad printer.

A couple of weeks ago, when I was trying to print a 15×23 image on the Harman paper, the printer discovered a new way to screw up. It would print almost the whole page, then the paper would start to get cocked at an angle. Finally, it would hang up on the side of the printer, there would be a popping sound, and the printer would spit the paper out with the trailing edge of the image misaligned.

I started to think about a new printer for my glossy work. The obvious choices were the just-shipping 3880, or the 4880. The big knock on the 4880 is that it is just as bad at swapping between photo black and matte black as my 9800. That wasn’t a problem for me, since I had the other printer for matte work. There is currently a rebate program that makes the 4880 not much more expensive than the 3880. However, the 4880 is huge, and heavy, and noisy. I decided to go with the devil I (sort of) knew, and ordered a 3880.

The Bleeding Edge

← Another Win 7 upgrade: preparations Using the Epson 3880 →

Comments

  1. Kattrice says

    March 20, 2010 at 10:44 am

    I’m having a terrible time getting my 3800 to accept my paper. I like to use fine art printmaking papers (Rives BFK) and then finish the print on an etching press. I used to have an occasional problem with these papers but now it is constant and it now doesn’t like the epson paper either. Any suggestions?

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    March 25, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Have you turned off the alignment check?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality
  • JimK on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.