• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Bleeding Edge / Voicemail in the cloud

Voicemail in the cloud

April 27, 2011 JimK 5 Comments

Our NEC voicemail system died a couple of weeks ago. It was going to be more than $1000 to fix it, so I decided to look at an alternative: a cloud-based voicemail system. AT&T is our local service provider, so I checked out their offering. It appeared to be pretty capable, and quite a step forward from the central office voice mail system we’d had 15 years ago, but I’d had a lot of trouble getting AT&T service properly configured in the past, so I decided to try a third-party solution. The service I picked is called eVoice. I’ve used the same company’s cloud-based fax service, eFax, with great success so it seemed like a easy decision. The cost: ten bucks a month.

When you sign up for cloud-based voicemail system, you get either a local telephone number or an 800 number assigned to you. If you want to use it for call screening, you give that number to your customers, suppliers, friends, and family. If, like me, you just want voicemail, you get your local phone company to forward calls on busy or no answer to the 800 or local number. Your service, in this case eVoice, answers the 800 number, plays a greeting to the caller, and takes the message. You can call eVoice at the same number and retrieve the messages.

So far, no big deal, right? Here’s the cloud magic: you can retrieve your messages

  • Via e-mail; eVoice sends you an e-mail with the calling number and an attached wave file containing the message.
  • Via the web; you go to the eVoice website, see all your messages, play the ones you want to hear, see all the calling numbers (whether or not the caller left a message), and delete the messages you’re finished with.
  • From your cell phone; there are eVoice apps for both Android and iPhone that let you do pretty much everything you can do from the eVoice website. If you have Wi-Fi coverage but no cell phone service, it’s no problem; the apps work just as they would if they were talking to the mother ship over a cell phone network.

A short telephone call to eVoice was all it took to sign up and get the system configured. There was a small glitch though. I’d set up two mailboxes, and, as I verified with a call to tech support, that means there’s no way a person without a touchtone phone can get to either mailbox. I couldn’t configure a default mailbox like I could with the NEC system. You wouldn’t think it would be a problem in this day and age, but we have a woman who calls us who has only a rotary phone. It was pretty easy to go to the eVoice web administration console and change the configuration to a single mailbox, which requires no input from the caller before they’re dumped into the voice recorder.

Then came the setting up of call forwarding. I expected that this wouldn’t go very smoothly, but even I was surprised. Here’s the sequence of events:

  • April 15. I called AT&T customer service and ordered no answer forwarding after eight rings to my eVoice 800 number. They said they have it working by five o’clock. When five o’clock rolled around, I gave it a try, and it didn’t work. By then customer service was closed for the weekend.
  • April 18. Customer service told me that my order could not be implemented because no answer forwarding conflicted with hunting, and my two lines were arranged in a hunt group. There’s no logical inconsistency here; it’s just the way the AT&T ESS#5 central office software is designed. I came up with a compromise configuration that removed the hunt group, added busy forwarding from one line to the other (but not the reverse, to avoid setting up infinite forwarding bouncing back and forth) and no answer forwarding from each line to my eVoice 800 number. AT&T said that this had to be implemented “manually”, and that it would take until five o’clock the following afternoon to be completed. I checked then. No joy.
  • April 20. I called customer service again. They’d lost the order. I gave it to them again. Promised implementation time was three o’clock on the 22nd. I didn’t get around to checking it until the day after that; it still wasn’t fixed.
  • April 25. Customer service told me that the order was still there but had not been completed. They said there was some problem with a new website that had been implemented for internal use. They promised that it would be done by five o’clock that night. Wrong.
  • April 26. Customer service told me that the order had been completed, and they couldn’t help me anymore. They transferred me to repair. I explained my problem. They said they’d fix it. An hour later, they had.

It works now. There is one problem. The forwarding begins after eight rings here, but the caller hears two or three more rings as AT&T transfers the call to eVoice. That’s not due to any delay on eVoice’s part; calls directly to the 800 number are answered immediately. The two or three extra rings are supplied by AT&T. Eleven rings is a lot to expect a caller to wait. In an in-house (non-cloud) voicemail system, the call is answered immediately after the eighth ring. I can either live with it as is, or ask AT&T to have the forwarding take place after six rings, meaning that the caller will hear eight or nine. Since making the change probably won’t be easy, I think I’ll wait and see how many complaints I get.

 

The Bleeding Edge

← A new day for The Last Word How to change e-mail providers →

Comments

  1. voicemail says

    July 6, 2011 at 10:57 pm

    great to know how voicemail is working well for you! please update us about forwarding issue you have, would like to know how it turns out.

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    July 7, 2011 at 7:31 am

    I am very happy with cloud voicemail in general, and eVoice in particular.I haven’t done anything about the number of rings before forwarding – which seems to be surprisingly variable – because I’m in the process of changing over to a new VoIP PBX. When the change is complete, the forwarding will be done in the PBX itself.

    I am so pleased with eVoice that I intend to keep using them instead of using the voicemail features built into the new PBX. While the PBX voicemail will send voice messages as e-mails, it doesn’t support iPhone and Android voicemail client apps.

    I intend to report on how the VoIP project goes in a future “Bleeding Edge” post.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 18, 2016 at 1:16 pm

      I changed my mind and went with the on-site NEC voicemail.

      Reply
  3. Rose says

    November 18, 2016 at 12:59 pm

    Thanks so much. I’m just starting a small business and want to keep my coaching calls separate from my personal iPhone calls. Have you had any experience of people talking about google voice vs. cloud’s eco ice? It looks like hat I would like due to availability of actual customer service support.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 18, 2016 at 1:15 pm

      Sorry, I can’t help you on that. I switched over to an in-house VoiceMail system that came with my NEC VoIP PBX, and I’m not using cloud VoiceMail any more.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.