• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 28mm f/1.4 Nikkor-D on Nikon D3x in deep IR

28mm f/1.4 Nikkor-D on Nikon D3x in deep IR

January 27, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

A couple of days ago, I tested the MTF vs f-stop of the 28mm f/1.4 Nikkor-D mounted on a IR-modified Sony alpha 7. At the time, there was some discussion as to why the lens delivered the best IR-only results at f/2.8. Jack Hogan speculated that it might be something with the adapter. I checked and found that the lens uses internal floating elements, which could be flummoxed by a too-short adapter, which left me agreeing with Jack.

I couldn’t just leave it there. I had to test my assumption.

Here’s the protocol:

  • Nikon D3x, modified by LifePixel with the “Deep IR” filter
  • 28mm f/1.4 Nikkor D
  • RRS L-plate
  • Landscape orientation
  • Arca Swiss C1 head
  • RRS TVC-44 legs.
  • Imatest SFRPlus target
  •  I focused the lens using live view at the taking aperture for one series and focused at f/1.4 for the other one.
  • Paul Buff Einstein strobe set to 10 watt-seconds, for the f/2.8 shots, 20 ws for the f/4 ones, 40 ws for the f/5.6 ones, following that progression until I got to f/16.
  • Mirror up mode, remote release
  • Images developed in Lightroom 5.7.1 with default settings, exported as TIFFs
  • measured on-axis MTF50 for horizontal edges.

The results:

D3x deep IR MTFa

There doesn’t seem to be any focus shift. Focusing wide open works as well at small apertures, and better at the widest ones.

F/2.8 still offers the best performance

I don’t think we can blame the adapter for the earlier data.

If I put a 830 nm lowpass filter on the lens and put it on the a7, we can get something to campare against the D3x results:

a7 D3x deepIR MTFa

 

The D3x has higher resolution. That’s because its AA filter is weaker.

Here’s the D3x:

F14f028-1_YB10_01_cpp

And here’s the a7:

R72F028-6_YA10_01_cpp

Note the zero in the a7 image at 0,6 cy/px. That’s what AA filters typically do.

 

The Last Word

← Sony a7II IBIS with 28mm lens Sony a7II 12-bit mode’s effect on shadows →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.