• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report: winnowing and gamut checking

A book report: winnowing and gamut checking

May 5, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

This is post seven in a series about my experiences in publishing a book. The series starts here.

I went to my Lightroom collection of the Staccato images. There were 609 of them. I told Lr to just show me the ones rated two stars and higher. That got it down to 380. I decided to go through all the remaining images, giving them a good look, in case I missed something, since with this series three stars and higher is normally my threshold for exhibition.

I culled the obvious not-ready-for prime-time images, and got the number to 153.  Then I started removing images that were similar to other, better, ones. Then I did another cull, this time being tougher. All that got me to 92 images, with a few different versions of the same set of captures. So I’m close to my goal of 80 images. I’ll stay with this set for a while, although, once I do the final cull, I may end up with fewer than 80.

I turned the Lr soft proofing on, set up the Coated GRACoL 2006 profile in the right-hand panel of the Develop module, turned the gamut limit alarm on, and went through all the images.

One was completely within the GRACoL gamut. Many were almost completely within the gamut. Many had a lot of important content outside of it. Here are two of the worst ones (the gamut alarm color is red):

pizzagamut

massagegamut

There were many images in which not much of the image was outside of the printer gamut, but those parts that were were important to the success of the photograph. Neon tubes are an example:

diner gamut

neon gamut

What I will do now is go through the images with gamut alarm off, rendering intent set to relative colorimetric, and see if there are any images whose presence in the book were marginal in the first place and suffer a lot from being forced into the gamut of the GRACoL press. Images that fall into that category probably aren’t worth the time and effort required to save them.

 

The Last Word

← A book report: hard copy proofing A book report: organization →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.