• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A dirt-cheap FE lens

A dirt-cheap FE lens

January 1, 2017 JimK 3 Comments

This is the first in a series of review posts about an inexpensive Chinese 35 mm lens for Sony E-mount cameras. The best way to see the rest of them is to scroll down to the bottom of this post — below the comments — and you’ll find pingback links to the subsequent posts. Click on them to navigate to each one in turn.

Alerted by aa DPR thread, I saw it on E-bay: a listing for a brand new 35mm f/2 FE lens for $167, including shipping. The brand was Viltrox, and it was made in China. Interested in the quality of these really low end Chinese lenses, I sprung for one. 

Three weeks later, I had it in my hand. Here’s the unboxing:

The lens came in a nice box, with a case and a UV filter of uncertain provenance thrown in

 

Opening up the box reveals a dense custom foam insert

 

Here’s the lens

 

The cap is made of metal, and is of high quality, although the release is just on one side. The threads are 43 mm.

 

The markings are nicely done

 

The lens mounted smoothly on the camera, and is nicely balanced there

 

Of course, the lens is manual focus only. It does not  send the f-stop to the camera for inclusion in the EXIF field. In fact, it sends no information at all. There are nice aperture click stops, but only for full stop changes. The focusing helicoid turns smoothly.

A promising beginning.

On the Sony a7RII, I aimed it at one of my standard test scenes on a gloomy day,

 

In the center, enlarged to 200% in Lightroom, with the aperture set to f/2:

Viltrox f/2

A little purple fringing, which in this case is indicative of Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration (LoCA)

I needed something to compare it to. I picked my best 35 mm f/2 lens, which is permanently attached to a Sony RX-1. That camera has 24 MP to the a7RII’s 42 MP, so I compensated in Lr to retain the same field of view. That and the RX1’s AA filter conspire to put the Sony lens at a disadvantage.

In the center at f/2  with the RX1:

RX1 f/2

The wonderful Sony lens is a bit blurrier, but freer of LoCA. Might this bargain lens be a winner?

Let’s look at the upper right corner:

Viltrox upper right corner f/2

Not so good. Awful, in fact. How does the RX1 do there?

RX1 upper right corner f/2

There are obvious sharpness differences, but they appear to be too great to be due to just a crappy lens design. I’m suspecting field curvature on the Viltrox. In addition, note that the Viltrox has a lot of corner falloff wide open, and the Sony RX1 lens does not.

If we focus the Viltrox on the upper right corner, the distance scale reads 10 feet. That is an indication of extreme field curvature.  Let’s look at the upper right corner in that case:

Viltrox upper right focus upper right f/2

Well, it’s not up to the quality of the Sony, even when the Sony is focused in the center, but it’s not sickeningly awful any more. 

Leaving the focus there, let’s look at the opposite corner:

Viltrox lower left, focus upper right f/2

The sharpness is about the same, indicating that the Viltrox lens is centered and free of tilt, if the other two corners work the same way, which they do.

There will be more tomorrow, but for now it looks like we have an unbelievably cheap, well constructed and assembled lens that has good center sharpness, fair to middling corner sharpness, and a large amount of field curvature. That and moderately bad LoCA, and a large amount of corner falloff.

 

The Last Word

← Shooting an event with the Sony a7RII Viltrox 35 mm f/2 FE stopped down →

Comments

  1. Ola says

    March 6, 2017 at 12:44 pm

    Interesting test, thank you for taking the time. It would be nice to have a cheap MF 35 without resorting to cumbersome adapters, so I’m going keep an eye out for this one on Fleabay.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Viltrox 35 mm f/2 FE stopped down says:
    January 2, 2017 at 9:26 am

    […] This is a continuation of an informal test of the $167 Viltrox 35 mm f/2 lens on a Sony a7RII camera. For comparison, I’ll be showing some images from the Sony RX1 with its native — and exemplary — 35 mm f/2 lens. The test starts here. […]

    Reply
  2. Viltrox 35 mm f/2 FE meets the bunny says:
    January 2, 2017 at 11:19 am

    […] This is a continuation of an informal test of the $167 Viltrox 35 mm f/2 lens on a Sony a7RII camera. For comparison, I’ll be showing images with the same camera and the Zeiss 35mm f/2 Biogon-M. The test starts here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.