• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A few of my favorite things

A few of my favorite things

January 1, 2016 JimK 8 Comments

As we enter the new year, my thoughts turn to some of the things that have made my photographic life easier, more enjoyable, and more successful.

Here are a few that come to mind.

Geared tripod heads

Once you’ve become accustomed to a geared head like the Arca Swiss C1 or D4, everything else will feel sloppy and imprecise. You’ll hate the fiddly framing that comes with a ball head, and you’ll have to leave more room around your subject so you can crop in post if you’re in a hurry. Yes, they’re bigger. Sure, they cost more. But these things last a long time and won’t become obsolete until the computer driven motorized heads arrive. By that time I expect to be in my dotage.

Integral pull-out lens hoods

They don’t work quite as effectively as petal hoods. They don’t work at all on wide angle lenses. But they’re always there, and they don’t take any time at all to set up. In fact, if you’re not going to use the hood, you can pretty much ignore it, which isn’t the case with reversible hoods. Leica, thanks for keeping this old tradition alive.

External intervalometers

They offer more flexibility than the ones that are built into cameras. They’re not flexible enough or easy enough to program, and the haptics can be dodgy. But they don’t reset when the power fails, and, with the right adapters, you can use them on many cameras.

Lightroom

It seems to get a few bugs (and fix most of the old ones) with every release. It can bog down with big catalogs. It could be better at using lots of cores. But, boy, is it a huge improvement over anything that went before, especially when you’re doing multi-thousand image shoots. And there are little bonuses cropping up all the time: dehaze in an adjustment brush – wowee!

Wescott LED panels

These little beauties let you change the color temperature from practically candlelight to 6000K. They are flexible, and you can wrap them around your subject if you’re shooting small stuff. The adjustments of color temp and intensity are reasonably well calibrated. They’re fairly bright. The switching frequency is high enough not to give you trouble with inhomogeneous exposures. Not cheap to buy. They don’t act cheap, either.

Nikon D810, Sony a7RII

These cameras show that patience, listening to your customers, and continued development can really pay off.

Old glass on mirrorless

Leica M and R lenses. Zeiss manual focus SLR lenses. Brought back from the grave, and the eBay prices show that it’s no secret.

IR modded mirrorless cameras

No more black filters. WYSIWYG. No fogging unless you do it in post. Whee!

Paul Buff Einsteins

Short flash duration. Precise dimming without change of color temperature. Small and light. No power supply needed. Prices that are a fraction of what the 80s European studio flashes cost in 80s dollars.

 

The Last Word

← Focal length affinity How I’m doing →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    January 2, 2016 at 5:58 am

    Misc comments:
    * Geared tripod head: my understanding is that having the post elevated reduces tripod rigidity and stability. I suppose that isn’t an issue with plenty of light. Also, your tripods are probably more heavy-duty than mine.

    * I really like the very flexible intervalometer and enhanced BULB provided by MagicLantern for Canon DSLR’s. It has spoiled me for the lame PlayMemories app, and external intervalometers.

    * LightRoom: On my Window desktop, I’ve been very impressed with how well Adobe products utilize all available of my 4 cores + hyper-threading. I regularly get near 100% utilization with ACR and DngConverter.

    I don’t really use PS enough to notice whether the Windows TaskManager CPU meter pegs out. I mostly use Lightroom for printing of multiple images, and the CPU meter is regularly pegged while preparing multiple images for printing.

    I do most edits in ACR, then sync to Lightroom. That seems to often peg the CPU meter with lots of changes to multiple files.

    Overall, I consider Adobe to pretty much be among the most advanced in efficient threading. Maybe better than Microsoft’s Visual Studio, which should be very good at multi-threading.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      January 2, 2016 at 7:25 am

      * Geared tripod head: my understanding is that having the post elevated reduces tripod rigidity and stability. I suppose that isn’t an issue with plenty of light. Also, your tripods are probably more heavy-duty than mine.

      I’m talking about geared heads, like the ones I referenced, not geared columns. I hate geared columns, and haven’t used a tripod with them since the late 50s.

      Jim

      Reply
    • Jim says

      January 2, 2016 at 7:27 am

      Overall, I consider Adobe to pretty much be among the most advanced in efficient threading. Maybe better than Microsoft’s Visual Studio, which should be very good at multi-threading.

      AutoPano gets my vote. It routinely maxes out all 24 virtual cores on my workstation, which has two hexcore processors.

      Jim

      Reply
    • CarVac says

      January 3, 2016 at 7:22 am

      Pretty much any photo processing app should be multithreaded. It takes almost no effort at all. Adobe doesn’t deserve any particular credit for this.

      Visual Studio…well, that’s not photo editing, so it’s a lot harder to parallelize. I don’t blame it.

      Source: I write my own photo editor.

      Reply
  2. Tony says

    January 2, 2016 at 10:16 am

    It’s a great list and I’d like to expand a bit on two of the items.

    It’s better to have an in-camera interval timer than to not have one but they are fiddly and require far too many menu actions. Externals are more convenient but still rather generic in their design intent. When I shot a solar eclipse sequence with the desire to align the timing extremely precisely on the center of the event, I turned to four of my favorite things: an Arduino processor to run the show, a GPS module to set the timing, Eagle CAD to design the custom circuit board, and OSHPark PCB fabricators to help realize the project in a field-rugged form. All of the above are easy to learn and the final result is both inexpensive and exactly suited to the task. 3D printers can play a role too. We are currently in a golden age of “If you can’t buy it, then build it”.

    Lightroom: It not only does almost everything I need very rapidly, it is also highly extensible with third party plug-ins when you’ve hit its limits. Just a few minutes ago I delegated some precise perspective corrections to DxO Viewpoint and some tonal adjustments to NIK Color Efex Pro.

    Reply
    • Lynn Allan says

      January 2, 2016 at 5:05 pm

      My error. I didn’t know such heads existed. From a video, it appears they could really spoil you.

      PTGui usually does well keeping all 4+4 cores working hard. However, if it is a really large pano dimensionally, it can really bog down the entire system … like it is thrashing the temp drive[s].

      Agree on “golden era” … especially prototyping with 3D printers, and inexpensive controllers like the Arduino.

      Our local library has several 3D printers that the public can use, after training.

      Reply
  3. Tony says

    January 6, 2016 at 10:52 pm

    Arca-Swiss dovetails… especially when setting up to shoot in dim light. Priceless! Or should I say, worth exactly the price of a camera body and a lens.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. My least-favorite gear | The Last Word says:
    January 6, 2016 at 4:10 pm

    […] A few days ago, I posted a paean to some of the photographic gear that I used in 2015. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.