• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A new web site – theme requirements

A new web site – theme requirements

September 18, 2016 JimK 5 Comments

This is a continuation of a series of posts about reworking my website into one that is entirely WordPress based. The series starts here:

A new web site – general requirements

Having decided on WordPress, the key decision is what theme to use. If I get the right theme, customization to my specific needs and aesthetics will be easy, and done with no more than trivial code changes. Starting with the right theme is crucial. I don’t want to get hours and hours of my time (or a high-priced designer’s time) invested in an implementation, only to discover that the theme can’t be bent to do what I want.

So I thought I’d start my search for a theme by making a list of what I’d like it to do.

Here goes:

Be stable. This should go without saying. Don’t we all want our software to be stable? Of course we do. But there are tradeoffs. Stable software tends to be old and tested. That means it may lack modern features. I would be willing to sacrifice some features, for improved stability, but I’m not hard over on this one. The kinds of devices that people use to access the web are changing rapidly, and the server side software has to keep up with that.

Be secure. Another obvious one, huh? There are tradeoffs here, too. Security means defensive coding and thorough testing. I’m all for that. But complex web code is going to have errors that could lead to security breaches, and a big measure of how secure a them is is how diligent the developers are at tracking users experience, and how rapidly they fix problems when they crop up. Already we have treadoffs between my objectives, and we only have two so far, since rapid fixes are more likely to contain bugs.

Have lots of users.  This is in one sense in conflict with the security objective, and in one sense not. A small number of users means that you’re too small a target for the script writers to go after. That’s good, and it’s the reason that for a long time, Macintoshes were safe from viruses. But having lots of users means that there are lots of people out there beating on the sites every day, and security holes are more likely to be discovered. At the end of the day, I come down on the side of being part of a big crowd. Having lots of users also has beneficial implications for support, and for the providing company staying in business.

Be provided by a large company with a track record. WordPress continues to evolve. Themes need to be updated for compatibility. Users’ device change. Bugs need to be fixed. When you choose a theme, you’re not just getting a bunch of code, you’re — hopefully — getting a continuing and bountiful stream of future enhancements. You need your theme provider to stay in business, but not just that, you want them to flourish.

The main part of my web site is a series of what I call galleries. They are sometimes called portfolios by theme designers and marketeers. I am willing, if necessary, to have the gallery section of my website run on its own WordPress instance, so I don’t need to do blogging or post a lot of text pages using the theme that drives the galleries.. The next set of requirements deals with the gallery theme.

  • Support up to 50 galleries, each with up to 50 images.
  • Have a slide show feature.
  • Have a light table feature, with thumbnails and a large version of the selected image shown.
  • Have intuitive, simple navigation, and (ideally) support moving to the next image with the right arrow key, and going back to the previous on with the left arrow key.
  • Support artist’s statements for each gallery.
  • Allow captioning each image. Take the caption information from the image metadata. Allow it to be edited if need be.
  • Show captions in large and thumbnail views. Hover captions are OK.
  • Allow searching by caption and gallery (not essential, but nice to have).
  • Have a top-level page that allow selection of galleries.
  • Be able to add top-of-page banner links to all of the other parts  of my site, like this blog.
  • Be able to support top-level gallery access, and to go from there wither directly to a gallery, or to another page that has access to further galleries. I use this on my site currently for the underwater images, but I could decide to categorize the projects by type.
  • Compatible with common WordPress plug-ins such as WordFence, VaultPress, Akismet, etc.
  • SEO friendly.

And, carrying the general requirements from yesterday over:

  • Automatically format content appropriately for personal computers, tablets, and phones.
  • Use HTTP5

It’s not too long a list. I don’t need to sell images from the site. My problem is that there are an immense number of themes out there. How to choose?

 

The Last Word

← A new web site – general requirements A new web site — Photocrati sandbox →

Comments

  1. Matt O'Brien says

    September 18, 2016 at 11:07 am

    “Allow captioning each image. Take the caption information from the image metadata. Allow it to be edited if need be.”

    This is the area I had greatest level of grief when I built a WordPress site several years ago. I started with most of the same objectives as yourself. Make sure your theme and plug-ins can handle Title as well as Caption.

    I eventually gave up on WordPress (having solved most of my initial needs) becasue it became too much effort to maintain, ie not just WordPress, but all the supporting layers as well.

    I notice many services respect Title and Caption metadata now (eg Flickr) so hopefully this will be less of a challenge for you.

    Reply
  2. Max Davis says

    September 18, 2016 at 11:47 pm

    Look forward to your next instalment. I’m trying to set up my own photo website to showcase my wedding business, but I haven’t any website experience . A friend suggested looking at theme forest but its kind of difficult to choose with little guidance. Do you have any suggestions as to a way of approaching this, please?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      September 19, 2016 at 8:20 am

      With no website experience, it makes little sense for you to separate the hosting and template decisions, I think. Why not go with an all-in-one service, like this one?

      http://www.zenfolio.com/

      Downside: your site won’t be portable.

      Jim

      Reply
      • Lynn Allan says

        September 24, 2016 at 3:17 am

        I’ve been using Zenfolio for several years, and have been generally satisfied. However, I don’t have much of a basis of comparison … I shifted from another photo sharing host that went out of business. Also, I don’t use Zenfolio to sell photos, so I have no experience with how they handle a “shopping cart”.

        Reply
  3. Rajan Parrikar says

    September 29, 2016 at 9:07 pm

    I use the ProPhoto theme that is extremely customizable. Their latest release is terrific. In fact, my complaint now is that it is saddled with too many options.

    http://www.prophoto.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.