• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / a7II IBIS with the 180mm Apo-Telyt-R

a7II IBIS with the 180mm Apo-Telyt-R

January 7, 2015 JimK 4 Comments

The Leica 180mm f/3.4 Apo-Telyt-R is about the longest lens that feels right handheld on the alpha 7 cameras, with the exception of the Sony 70-200 f/4 FE lens. The 180 is really quite well suited to the camera.

How much does IBIS (known to Sony as SteadyShot) help?

I employed a test protocol based on one I used a few days ago.

  • The camera: the Sony a7II.
  • The lens: the Leica 180mm f/3.4 Apo-Telyt-R, with a Novaflex R to E adapter.
  • No filter, this time; I needed all the light I could get.
  • The lighting: a single Fotodiox LED-200WA-56 daylight balanced variable-output flood.
  • ISO set to 1600, f-stop set to 11, to minimize the effect of manual focusing errors.
  • Focusing manually at f/3.4, using the magnifier. The focus point as a Siemens star on the target.
  • Drive set to single
  • EFCS on
  • Manual exposure mode.
  • Hold the camera in the “Pete Souza” grip: left palm under base, left fingers bracing the underside of the front part of the lens, elbows against chest.
  • Exposure protocol: ND filter to minimum attenuation,, shutter to 1/1000 second, make 16 exposures with new focusing for each, turn the light down a stop, make 16 exposures… until you get to 1/60 of a second or so.
  • Inhale, exhale, brace, think calm thoughts, squeeze the shutter release, remembering to “pull through”.
  • Develop in Lightroom 5.7.1 with standard settings.
  • Crop, export as TIFFs, analyze for horizontal edge and vertical edge MTF50 in Imatest.
  • Export the results to Excel, crunch the stats, and graph.

Here’s what I got:

a7IISS180V

a7IISS180H

 

The heavy lines are the average,, or mean, values, for which the mathematical symbol is mu. The light lines are the mean plus and minus the standard deviation, or sigma, of the measurement set, and provide an estimate of repeatability. At least 2 stops of improvement, and more like three at the faster shutter speeds. The difference between the vertical and horizontal curves occurs because of the anisotropic nature of the a7II’s anti-aliasing filter — it mainly works in only one direction.

The 180 is solid to 1/125 second using IBIS, providing virtually the same level of performance as 1/1000 without it.

The Last Word

← Let’s keep this equipment analysis in perspective Sony a7II pushed-processed images →

Comments

  1. Jean Pierre says

    January 7, 2015 at 11:26 am

    Thanks and great Jim! Now, it is clear folk!

    Reply
  2. GreenLens says

    May 9, 2015 at 2:40 am

    Very good experiment, I like it! Does IBIS help during focusing? What is your setup?

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 9, 2015 at 6:42 am

      IBIS helps a lot during focusing. Setup? I use maximum magnification, if that’s what you mean.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony Tidbits… | sonyalpharumors says:
    May 8, 2015 at 8:30 pm

    […] (MirrorlessRumors). Full ZM 35/1.4 review at DearsSusans. a7II IBIS with the 180mm Apo-Telyt-R (Kasson). Sony A7 II as an Accessory: Can it Turn a Classic 180mm f/2.8 Into a Keeper? (Diglloyd). […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.